Kinney v Pardington

Case [2018] NZHC 155


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND NEW PLYMOUTH REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA NGĀMOTU ROHE

CIV-2013-443-058 [2018] NZHC 155

UNDER the Family Protection Act 1955

IN THE MATTER

of the estate of KENNETH JOHN PARDINGTON (deceased)

BETWEEN

ERIN MAUREEN KINNEY Plaintiff

AND

MYRTLE MARGARET PARDINGTON, DAVID JOHN PARDINGTON AND KENNETH MARK PARDINGTON Defendants

AND

MYRTLE MARGARET PARDINGTON, DAVID JOHN PARDINGTON AND KENNETH MARK PARDINGTON Interested Parties

CIV-2017-443-73

BETWEEN  ERIN MAUREEN KINNEY Plaintiff

ANDROYCE WILLIAM WOOD as Trustee of the KJ PARDINGTON FAMILY TRUST First Respondent

DAVID JOHN PARDINGTON as Trustee

of the KJ PARDINGTON FAMILY TRUST Second Respondent

KENNETH MARK PARDINGTON as Trustee of the KJ PARDINGTON FAMILY TRUST

Third Respondent

WAYNE FRANCIS McCURDY as Trustee of the KJ PARDINGTON FAMILY TRUST Fourth Respondent

KINNEY v PARDINGTON [2018] NZHC 155 [15 February 2018]

Hearing: 5 February 2018

Appearances:

C T Gudsell QC and D E G Nielsen for Plaintiff in FPA
proceedings and Trust proceedings
K A McKenzie for Defendants in FPA proceedings
S W Hughes QC for Interested Parties in FPA proceedings
D Matheson for second, third and fourth respondents

Judgment:

15 February 2018

JUDGMENT OF CULL J

[1]      This decision concerns a consolidation application, seeking to consolidate Family Protection Act 1955 (FPA) proceedings, which were substantively heard in August 2016, with Trust proceedings recently filed on 10 October 2017. The plaintiff applies for consolidation of both proceedings because there are common questions of fact and/or law arising in both proceedings, relating to the historic administration of the K J Pardington Family Trust (the Trust) and the Estate of K J Pardington (the Estate).   In the alternative, the plaintiff seeks particular discovery before the FPA proceeding is determined.1

[2]      The  FPA proceedings  were  adjourned  on  16 August  2016  part-heard,  to determine the quantum of the estate.  At issue are the liabilities of the estate to the Trust, including a Deed of Assignment dated 20 December 2013, which was entered into 10 months after the date of commencement of these proceedings on 8 February

2013.   In my minute of 16 August 2016 I recorded that with the Estate’s total indebtedness of $526,474.49, the Court required clarification of the appropriate deduction from the value of the Estate assets.2

Factual background

[3]      Since the adjournment of the proceedings on 16 August 2016, the parties have filed numerous memoranda and evidence in response to my minute of 16 August 2016.

1      The details of the discovery sought are dealt with under the heading “Particular discovery” later in this judgment.

2      Minute of Cull J, 16 August 2016.

Over this time, certain trust documents have been provided, following requests by the plaintiff for source documentation of the trust account material made available to date.3

Trust proceedings

[4]      On 10 October 2017, during the course of the exchanges of documents and memoranda,  the  plaintiff  issued  Trust  proceedings  against  the  trustees  of  the K J Pardington Family Trust, comprising Kenneth and David Pardington together with two independent trustees.  The independent trustees are not…

Continue reading Kinney v Pardington

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Kinney v Pardington [2018] NZHC 155
Case
[2018] NZHC 155
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This decision concerns a consolidation application, seeking to consolidate Family Protection Act 1955 (FPA) proceedings, which were substantively heard in August 2016, with Trust proceedings recently filed on 10 October 2017. The plaintiff, Erin Maureen Kinney, applies for consolidation of both proceedings because there are common questions of fact and/or law arising in both proceedings, relating to the historic administration of the K J Pardington Family Trust (the Trust) and the Estate of K J Pardington (the Estate). In the alternative, the plaintiff seeks particular discovery before the FPA proceeding is determined. The FPA proceedings were adjourned on 16 August 2016 part-heard, to determine the quantum of the estate. At issue are the liabilities of the estate to the Trust, including a Deed of Assignment dated 20 December 2013, which was entered into 10 months after the date of commencement of these proceedings on 8 February 2013. The Trust proceedings allege breaches of trust and mistake, and seek remedies against the trustees personally. The plaintiff submits that because there are common questions of fact and/or law arising in both proceedings, particularly relating to the historic administration of the Trust, the Court should hear both proceedings together, as a view will need to be formed as to the valid liabilities of the Estate and the pattern of conduct of the Estate executors and the trustees. The Court declined to consolidate the proceedings because the FPA proceedings are awaiting a determination on the quantum of the Estate, and the Trust proceedings involve two trustees who are not parties to the FPA proceedings. However, the Court ordered the disclosure of certain documents to the plaintiff in the alternative application for particular discovery.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.