IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAURANGA REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TAURANGA MOANA ROHE
CIV-2025-470-77
[2025] NZHC 1271
IN THE MATTER OF Breach of Trust BETWEEN
DESMOND TATANA KAHOTEA
Plaintiff
AND
PHILLIP HIKAIRO, NGARONGO ORMSBY, NORMAN RAHIRI, SYLVIA WILLISON, HENARE DOUGLAS as
Trustees of the WAIROA HAPŪ SETTLEMENT TRUST
Defendants
Hearing: On the papers Appearances:
D Naden for the Plaintiff
Judgment:
21 May 2025
JUDGMENT OF GARDINER J
This judgment was delivered by me on 21 May 2025 at 4.45 pm pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Solicitors:
Tamaki Legal, Auckland
KAHOTEA v HIKAIRO [2025] NZHC 1271 [21 May 2025]
[1] The plaintiff, Desmond Kahotea, has filed a without notice application for an interim injunction restraining the defendants from paying a negotiator’s fee or any portion thereof to a negotiator.
Facts
[2] Dr Kahotea is a member of the Wairoa Hapū and a beneficiary of the Wairoa Hapū Settlement Trust. The defendants are the trustees of the Wairoa Hapū Settlement Trust formed under a Deed of Trust dated 28 May 2012. The trustees manage settlement property on behalf of the beneficiaries of the Trust.
[3] On 23 July 2020, the trustees entered into a compensation agreement with Tauriko Property Group LP and Tauriko West Limited (the Developers). The Developers agreed to pay the Trust $3,000,000 plus GST in compensation for the effect of their intended development on the cultural value of the land in Tauriko West, Tauranga. The compensation was to be paid in three instalments. In return, the trustees agreed to support the Developers’ application for resource consent.
[4] For negotiating the compensation agreement with the Developers on behalf of the Trust, the trustees agreed to pay a fee (Negotiator’s Fee) to a third-party negotiator (Negotiator). The negotiated fee is 40 per cent of the compensation, or $1,200,000 plus GST.
[5] The first compensation instalment of $300,000 plus GST was paid to the Trust in 2021. The Negotiator was paid $120,000 plus GST as part of the Negotiator’s Fee.
[6] The second compensation instalment of $600,000 plus GST was paid by the Developer to the Trust on 16 May 2025. It is expected that by close of business on 21 May 2025 the Negotiator will be paid $240,000 plus GST by the Trust.
[7] The plaintiff has filed an ordinary proceeding in this Court, seeking an order that the trustees acted in breach of trust when they agreed to the Negotiator’s Fee.
[8]The plaintiff anticipates that the trustees are likely to defend the claim.
Assessment
[9] The Court follows a three-step approach when assessing whether to grant by way of interim injunction:1
(a)whether there is a serious question to be tried;
(b)the balance of convenience;
(c)where the overall justice lies.
[10] I am satisfied, based on the application and the affidavit of Dr Kahotea filed in support, that there are serious questions to be tried. These include whether the trustees breached the trust deed by agreeing to a Negotiator’s Fee…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Kahotea v Hikairo and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] NZHC 1271
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.