IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE
CIV-2023-404-002070
[2024] NZHC 2454
2454 the Companies Act 1993 and Part 19 of the High Court Rules IN THE MATTER
of the liquidation of Autoterminal New Zealand Ltd (in Liquidation)
BETWEEN
AND AND
KIERAN MICHAEL JONES, STEVEN KHOV and THOMAS LEE RODEWALD
(as liquidators of Autoterminal New Zealand Ltd)
ApplicantsIBC JAPAN LTD
First RespondentKEVYN BOTES
Intervener
Hearing: 4, 5 and 6 June 2024
Closing submissions: 21 June 2024
Counsel:
B J Burt and J Tunna for Applicants
R J Hollyman KC and E K J Gamet for IBC B Gustafson for Intervener
Judgment:
30 August 2024
JUDGMENT OF BREWER J
This judgment was delivered by me on 30 August 2024 at 3 pm pursuant to Rule 11.5 High Court Rules.
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
JONES & ORS v IBC JAPAN LTD & ANOR [2024] NZHC 2454 [30 August 2024]
Introduction.......................................................................................................... [1]
Background.......................................................................................................... [8]
The law............................................................................................................... [22]
Reasonable remuneration [25]
Medforce 1 [27]
Medforce 2 [30]
Re Roslea Path Ltd [31]
Expenses [38]
What was done?................................................................................................. [43]
Witnesses and evidence..................................................................................... [51]
Evidence admissibility [59]
The issues............................................................................................................ [60]
Discussion........................................................................................................... [78]
The complexity of the liquidation [80]
Conclusion [88]
Whether it was necessary to retain three liquidators [91]
Conclusion [98]
Over servicing [104]
Conclusion [116]
Over resourcing [120]
Conclusion [122]
IBC [124]
Conclusion [131]
The liquidators and Mr Tyler [135]
Conclusion [138]
Expenses [140]
Conclusion [147]
Decision............................................................................................................. [150]
Costs.................................................................................................................. [160]
Introduction
[1] Section 284 of the Companies Act 1993 (the Act) empowers a court to, among other things, review or fix the remuneration of a liquidator at a level which is reasonable in the circumstances.
[2] On 11 September 2021, Messrs Khov, Jones and Rodewald (the liquidators) were appointed liquidators of Autoterminal New Zealand Ltd (ATNZ) by its sole director, Mr Tyler. On 11 September 2023, the liquidators filed an application under s 284 of the Act for orders:
1.1fixing the applicants’ remuneration to 20 August 2023 at
$1,232,801.41 + GST and disbursements of $618,706.15 + GST; and
1.2directing the applicants to deduct their remuneration, and fees and expenses properly incurred, in bringing this application from the funds held by them in the liquidation of Autoterminal New Zealand Limited (ATNZ); and
1.3to the extent the funds held by the applicants in the liquidation of ATNZ are insufficient to satisfy the remuneration, and the fees and expenses properly incurred by the applicants, in bringing this application, those fees and expenses be paid (on a solicitor and client basis) by IBC Japan Limited (IBC).
[3] IBC Japan Ltd (IBC) filed a notice of opposition as an interested party on 13 October 2023. The grounds of its opposition are:
aThe liquidation of Autoterminal New Zealand Limited (in Liquidation) has been carried out in an inefficient manner with the result that excessive time has been spent on certain aspects of the liquidation.
bA large percentage of hours applied to the liquidation have been charged by the three applicants personally…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Jones v IBC Japan Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] NZHC 2454
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.