IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAURANGA REGISTRY
CIV-2014-470-158 [2016] NZHC 1269
UNDER the Companies Act 1993 BETWEEN
INTERNET TRADERS LIMITED First Plaintiff
IT PHARMACEUTICAL SUPPLIES LIMITED
Second Plaintiff
JOHN ROULSTON HEALE Third Plaintiff
JOHN ROULSTON HEALE
LAUREN JOYCE HEALE as trustees of the JR and LJ HEALE FAMILY TRUST and
HOLLAND BECKETT TREUSTEE NO.5
LIMITED Fourth Plaintiffs
AND
NICOLE JEAN HUTSON (FORMERLY NICOLE JEAN WILLIAMS)
Defendant
Hearing: 9 May 2015 at 2:15pm Appearances:
D H McLellan QC and A Sinclair for Plaintiffs
R E Harrison QC for DefendantJudgment:
13 June 2016
JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE R M BELL
This judgment was delivered by me on 13 June 2016 at 5:00pm
pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules
Solicitors/Counsel:
…………………………………………………….
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Daniel H McLellan QC, Auckland, for Plaintiffs
Ken Patterson, Tauranga, for Plaintiffs
Rodney E Harrison QC, Auckland, for DefendantAbernethy Broatch Law, Mt Maunganui, for Defendant
INTERNET TRADERS LIMITED v HUTSON (FORMERLY WILLIAMS) [2016] NZHC 1269 [13 June 2016]
Introduction
[1] This is another decision on the plaintiffs’ pleadings. In the first decision I dealt with the plaintiffs’ second amended statement of claim.1 In the second, Heath J addressed the third amended statement of claim.2 After that, the plaintiff instructed new counsel and a fourth amended statement of claim was filed. The defendant objected to that pleading. I gave directions on 10 February 2016 for the plaintiffs to
file and serve a draft proposed amended pleading and for the defendant to file any applications in respect of that proposed pleading. She applied to strike out the proposed amended pleading, or for further particulars.
[2] The background to the proceeding has been given in earlier judgments,
especially Heath J’s decision on the plaintiffs’ application for an interim injunction.3
Notwithstanding changes in pleadings, the most important part of the plaintiffs’ case has always been that, leading up to her resignation as director on 23 June 2014, Mrs Williams (now Mrs Hutson4) breached duties she owed to IT Pharmaceutical Supplies Ltd. Those breaches affected the business of the company adversely and also enabled her to set up a competing business. In that new business she has used confidential information obtained while a director of IT Pharmaceutical Supplies
Ltd.
[3] The draft pleading has these causes of action:
1Internet Traders Ltd sues Mrs Hutson for breach of directors’ duties under the Companies Act 1993 for making unauthorised payments, and also for certain actions, which are pleaded elsewhere (in paragraph 29), as detrimental to and in breach of duty to
IT Pharmaceutical Supplies Ltd.
1 Internet Traders Ltd v Williams [2015] NZHC 1809.
2 Internet Traders Ltd v Williams [2015] NZHC 2562.
3 Internet Traders Ltd v Williams [2014] NZHC 3407, [2015] NZCCLR 7.
4 At the start of the proceeding, she was Nicole Jean Williams, but she has remarried and is now
Nicole Jean Hutson.
2In the alternative to the first, Internet Traders Ltd sues her for breach of fiduciary duty, relying on the same…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Internet Traders Limited v Hutson (formerly Williams) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] NZHC 1269
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.