IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND INVERCARGILL REGISTRY
CIV-2017-425-000016 [2017] NZHC 1444
UNDER the Land Transfer Act 1952 IN THE MATTER
of an application for an order that caveat
10697986.1 not lapseBETWEEN
T K HUANG Applicant
AND
DAWSON BUILDERS LIMITED Respondent
Hearing: 21 June 2017 Appearances:
R Reeve for Applicant
A J Logan for RespondentJudgment:
27 June 2017
JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE OSBORNE [on application for order that caveat not lapse]
Introduction
[1] Thomas Huang asserts that he is the purchaser of a commercial property at Cromwell pursuant to an unconditional agreement to purchase the property from Dawson Builders Limited (DBL). Mr Huang caveated the title to protect his interest. DBL commenced the caveat lapsing procedure under s 145A Land Transfer Act 1952 (the Act).
[2] Mr Huang now applies for an order that his caveat not lapse.
HUANG v DAWSON BUILDERS LIMITED [2017] NZHC 1444 [27 June 2017]
The agreement
[3] The agreement, dated 16 January 2017, is on the standard REINZ/ADLS
form.1
[4] By the agreement DBL agrees to sell to Mr Huang the property for $525,000. The agreement incorporates all the general terms of sale.
[5] The agreement contains, as a further term of sale (“clause 19”), a condition in the following terms:
19.0 Lawyers Approval as to Title.
This agreement is conditional on Building Covenance (sic) for building accommodation satisfaction for 15 working day (sic) from signing Date.
Settlement on 14th April 2017.
[6] There is a definition of “working day” in clause 1.1(32) of the agreement,
which provides:
“Working day” means any day of the week other than:
(a) Saturday, Sunday, Waitangi Day, Good Friday, Easter Monday, Anzac Day, the Sovereign’s Birthday, and Labour Day;
(b) If Waitangi Day or Anzac Day falls on a Saturday or Sunday, the following Monday;
(c) A day in the period commencing on the 24th day of December in any year and ending 5th day of January (or in the case of sub-clause
10.2(2) the 15th day of January) in the following year, both days
inclusive;
(d) The day observed as the anniversary of any province in which the property is situated.
A working day shall be deemed to commence at 9.00 am and to terminate at
5.00 pm.
[7] As the provincial holiday in Otago is observed on 20 March, it did not constitute a “working day” and fell to be excluded from the calculation of “working
days” under this agreement. The provincial holiday in Auckland (observed on the
1 Form approved by the Real Estate Institute of NZ Incorporated and Auckland District Law
Society Incorporated, 9th ed, 2012 (5).
Monday nearest to 29 January) is irrelevant as the property is not situated there. On the other hand, Waitangi Day (6 February) fell within the 15 working day period from 16 January 2017. On application of the agreement’s definition of “working day”, the final date for confirmation of satisfaction of the clause 19 conditions was 7
February 2017.
[8] Clause 10.8 of the agreement deals…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Huang v Dawson Builders Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2017] NZHC 1444
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.