IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND GISBORNE REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TŪRANGANUI-A-KIWA ROHE
CIV-2024-416-8
[2025] NZHC 1227
UNDER Part 18 High Court Rules, s 21 Administration Act 1969 IN THE MATTER OF
removal of executor/trustee, appointment of independent executor
BETWEEN
CHRISTINE LUCY HEPBURN
Plaintiff
AND
ANGELA JOY ALBERT
Defendant
On the papers: Counsel:
P A Depledge for Plaintiff
Judgment:
19 May 2025
JUDGMENT OF GRAU J
[1] On 13 November 2024 following a formal proof hearing, I granted Ms Hepburn’s application to remove her and her sister, Ms Albert, as executors of the estate of their father, Robert Taane.1
[2] At that stage it had not been confirmed whether the Public Trust would consent to appointment as an independent administrator of the estate.2 Accordingly, I issued my decision as an interim judgment. I directed counsel for Ms Hepburn to identify an appropriate independent administrator, after which I indicated I would issue a final
1 Hepburn v Albert [2024] NZHC 3373.
2 Mr Depledge had advised that, although the Public Trust had previously consented to appointment, it appeared they had had a change of heart. He was confident, however, that he could convince them otherwise.
HEPBURN v ALBERT [2025] NZHC 1227 [19 May 2025]
decision removing Ms Hepburn and Ms Albert as executors and appointing a replacement.
[3] Mr Depledge has now advised the Court that Perpetual Guardian has agreed to appointment as executor of the estate and has provided a letter of engagement. I am satisfied the appointment is appropriate.
[4] Accordingly, I order that Christine Hepburn and Angela Albert are to be removed as executors of the estate of Robert Taane and Perpetual Guardian is to be appointed as replacement executor.
[5] It appears that costs remain to be determined. Mr Depledge should provide a schedule of costs and I will determine costs on the papers.
Grau J
cc: P A Depledge
- AGLC
- Hepburn v Albert [2025] NZHC 1227
- Case
- [2025] NZHC 1227
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the application for the removal of Hepburn and Albert as executors and the appointment of an independent executor. It had to assess whether the new executor, Perpetual Guardian, was suitable for the role and whether the application was justified. The court had to determine if the removal of Hepburn and Albert was in the best interest of the estate and its beneficiaries.
The court found that the application for the removal of Hepburn and Albert as executors was justified, and the appointment of Perpetual Guardian as the new executor was appropriate. The court accepted that there had been issues with the administration of the estate, and the removal of Hepburn and Albert was necessary. The court also noted that Perpetual Guardian had agreed to take on the role and had provided the necessary documentation. The court ordered the removal of Hepburn and Albert as executors and the appointment of Perpetual Guardian as the new executor.
The court ordered that Christine Hepburn and Angela Albert be removed as executors of the estate of Robert Taane and that Perpetual Guardian be appointed as the replacement executor. The court directed counsel for Hepburn to provide a schedule of costs, which the court would determine on the papers.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.