Henkel Kgaa v Holdfast NZ Limited
Case
•
[2006] NZSC 57
•4 August 2006
No judgment structure available for this case.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
43/2006
[2006] NZSC 57
BETWEENHENKEL KGAA
Appellant
ANDHOLDFAST NZ LIMITED
Respondent
Court:Blanchard, Tipping and McGrath JJ
Counsel:J O Upton QC for Appellant
I Finch and D L Marriott for Respondent
Judgment:4 August 2006
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
A.Leave to appeal is granted.
B.The approved grounds are:
1.Whether Henkel pleaded and proved that it had artistic copyright (by collocation or arrangement) in one or more of the Cipadue drawings.
2.Whether Holdfast infringed any copyright that Henkel established.
Solicitors:
Baldwins, Wellington for Appellant
James Wells, Auckland for Respondent
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
K v Police [2019] NZHC 1258
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0