IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY
CIV-2010-409-000559 [2016] NZHC 2969
IN THE MATTER of the Insolvency Act 2006 AND
IN THE MATTER
of the bankruptcy of DAVID IAN HENDERSON
BETWEEN
HAVENLEIGH GLOBAL SERVICES LIMITED AND FM CUSTODIANS LIMITED
Judgment Creditors (Substituted
Creditors)AND
DAVID IAN HENDERSON Judgment Debtor
Public
Examination:
Submissions:
3-7, 11-14, 19-20 August, 27 October 2015
10-12 October 2016
Appearances:
J N Foster and C R Vinnell for Official Assignee
D I Henderson (bankrupt) in personT Cooley (counsel assisting the Court) (attending for submissions)
Livingspace Properties Ltd (in liq) and FM Custodians Ltd
(objecting creditors) (excused from attendance)Judgment:
9 December 2016
JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE OSBORNE
under ss 298 – 299 Insolvency Act 2006
HAVENLEIGH GLOBAL SERVICES LIMITED v HENDERSON [2016] NZHC 2969 [9 December 2016]
The public examination of a bankrupt ...............................................................[1] The statutory regime ............................................................................................[4] Sections 298 – 299 Insolvency Act [4] The Court’s discretion under s 298 of the Act [7] The Court’s discretion under s 299 of the Act [12] What is the subject-matter of a public examination? [15] What is not the subject-matter of the public examination? [16] The circumstances of Mr Henderson’s adjudication in bankruptcy .............[19] The immediate cause of bankruptcy [19] The broader background to Mr Henderson’s bankruptcy [22] Extent of indebtedness at adjudication [28]
(a) Form of claims submitted by creditors [40] (b) Calculation of interest [41] (c) “Overstated claim” – Allied Farmers Investments Ltd
(Allied Farmers) [42] (d) “Overstated claim” – Bank of New Zealand (BNZ) [44] (e) “Overstated claim” – SCF (now CAM) [45] (f) “Overstated claim” – Dominion Finance Group Ltd (Dominion) [47] (g) “Overstated claim” – Equitable [48] (h) “Overstated claim” – FM Custodians Ltd (FM Custodians) [49] (i) “Overstated claim” – Inland Revenue Department (IRD) [50] (j) “Overstated claim” – Strategic Finance Limited (Strategic) [51] (k) Unlisted creditors’ claim – Mr Henderson’s sister and brother-in-law [52]
(m) Cross-claim – Allied Farmers [53] (n) Cross-claim – SCF [54] Summary of the extent of Mr Henderson’s indebtedness [55] Objections to discharge......................................................................................[59] Mr Henderson’s pre-adjudication conduct......................................................[61] First bankruptcy – 1996 to 1999 [61] The direct causes of Mr Henderson’s present bankruptcy ............................[72] Personal guarantees of the debts of companies and an associate [74] Personal taxation liability – the RFD advances [94]
Mr Henderson’s business approach as explained to the Ministry of
Economic Development [116] Corporate structure established between 1999 and 2010 [121] Standard of corporate management [124] Corporate management approach [129] Administration [133] Rulings and judgments of matters previously litigated ................................[152] Behaviours identified in judgments and rulings [152] Early taxation offences [153]
Mr Henderson’s agent-liability for GST on the Christchurch City
Council sale – August 2008 [154] (a) Issue [154] (b) The Taxation Review Authority decision [157] (c) Related litigation – PVIL v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [167] (d) Further related litigation – Commissioner of Inland Revenue
v Forbes [170] (e) Mr Henderson’s evidence at public examination [172] Financial Reporting Act offences – September 2008 [175]
(a) Issue [175] (b) The…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Havenleigh Global Services Ltd v Henderson and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] NZHC 2969
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.