Gray v The Queen

Case

[2021] NZCA 202

20 May 2021 at 9 am


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND

I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA

 CA287/2019
 [2021] NZCA 202

BETWEEN

HAYDEN ANTHONY GRAY
Appellant

AND

THE QUEEN
Respondent

Court:

French, Courtney and Goddard JJ

Counsel:

A M S Williams for Appellant
A J Ewing for Respondent

Judgment:
(On the papers)

20 May 2021 at 9 am

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

AThe application under s 24 of the Criminal Disclosure Act 2008 is granted.

BThe Registry is to allocate a fixture for the non-party disclosure hearing and serve Forensic Pathology South Island with the documents set out at [7].

CAny party wishing to file written submissions should do so no later than two working days before the hearing.

DPermission is granted to appear at the hearing remotely by AVL should any party so wish.

____________________________________________________________________

REASONS OF THE COURT

(Given by French J)

  1. Mr Gray is appealing his conviction for inflicting grievous bodily harm on his four-week-old baby son.  The baby later died.

  2. In support of his appeal, Mr Gray has applied for non-party disclosure of the slides taken from the baby’s brain at the post-mortem.[1]  He has retained an overseas expert who advises that he needs the slides before being able to give an opinion on the conviction appeal.

    [1]Criminal Disclosure Act 2008, s 24.

  3. The slides are in the custody of Forensic Pathology South Island.  The clinical director of Forensic Pathology, Dr Martin Sage, has expressed various concerns about releasing the slides and requires a Court order before doing so. 

  4. The Crown consents to the Court ordering a non-party disclosure hearing under s 25 of the Criminal Disclosure Act 2008.

  5. We agree that is appropriate.  Although Dr Sage does not consider the slides have the relevance claimed by the appellant, it is not possible for us to reach a concluded view on that at this stage.  On the face of it, they do appear to be relevant.

  6. It follows that the criteria under s 25 of the Criminal Disclosure Act are satisfied.  We therefore grant the application for a non-party disclosure hearing and direct the Registry to allocate a fixture date.

  7. We also direct that no less than five working days before the hearing date, the Registry is to serve on Forensic Pathology South Island:[2]

    (a)a copy of the appellant’s application;

    (b)a summons under s 160 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011; and

    (c)a copy of the order made by the Court under s25 of the Criminal Disclosure Act.

    [2]Section 26(1)(a).

  8. The summon referred to above should require the attendance of a representative of Forensic Pathology South Island at the hearing.

  9. Any party including Forensic Pathology South Island who wishes to file written submissions should do so no later than two working days before the hearing.

  10. Finally we record that permission is granted for any of the parties to appear at the hearing remotely by AVL should they so wish.

Solicitors:
Crown Law Office, Wellington for Respondent


Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
Gray v The Queen [2021] NZCA 298

Cases Citing This Decision

1

Gray v The Queen [2021] NZCA 298
Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0