IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
CIV-2013-404-1302 [2015] NZHC 611
UNDER Part 18 of the High Court Rules and the
Companies Act 1993
IN THE MATTER
of the liquidation of NZNet Internet
Services Limited (in liquidation)BETWEEN
DAMIEN GRANT AND STEVEN KHOV
Plaintiffs
AND
ROWAN KENLEY JOHNSTON First Defendant
STEPHEN ANDREWS Second Defendant
GEORGE POYKAIL THOMAS Third Defendant
Hearing: 9-13 June, 14-15 August 2014 Appearances:
B J Norling and J Boparoy for plaintiffs
S J Ropati for first defendantS H Barter for second defendant (leave to withdraw granted) Third defendant in person
Judgment:
30 March 2015
JUDGMENT OF BROWN J
GRANT & ORS v JOHNSTON & ORS [2015] NZHC 611 [30 March 2015]
Table of Contents
Paragraph No.
Introduction [1] Formulation of claim [5]
Relevant history of events [10]
Agreement with Horizon Pacific Group [13] Mr Johnston becomes a director and shareholder [20] The operation of NZNet during 2010 [28] Mr Thomas becomes involved [52] The first quarter of 2011 [57] The revelations in April 2011 [68] Mr Thomas becomes a director [75] Mr Thomas resigns [85] Mr Johnston resigns [90] The liquidation of NZNet [94]
Overview of liquidators’ case [97] Mr Johnston’s affirmative defence [100]
The s 135 claim [105]
Mr Andrews [107] Mr Johnston [111] Mr Thomas [122]
The s 137 claim [127] The s 136 claim [132]
The second stage [138]
Mr Andrews [140] Mr Johnston [141] Mr Thomas [146]
The s 194 claim [158]
Maintenance of accounting records of NZNet [162] The liquidators’ submissions [165] Analysis [169] Disposition [175] Costs [176]
Introduction
[1] NZNet Internet Services Ltd (in liquidation) (NZNet) was incorporated on 12 July
1995. The second defendant (Mr Andrews) was the sole shareholder and a director from that date. At all material times NZNet carried on business in Albany as an internet service provider specialising in providing niche business services including wireless, fibre, voice, backup and server hosting.
[2] By special resolution of the shareholders of NZNet on 17 November 2011 the plaintiffs were appointed liquidators at 3 pm pursuant to s 241(2)(a) of the Companies Act
1993 (the Act).
[3] In this proceeding the plaintiffs seek orders under ss 300 and 301 of the Act against the defendants who were directors of NZNet during the following periods:
(a) First defendant (Mr Johnston) from 30 December 2009 to 15 September 2011. (b) Mr Andrews at all material times;
(c) Third defendant (Mr Thomas) from 5 May 2011 to 10 August 2011.
[4] At the commencement of the hearing Mr Barter advised that Mr Andrews would not be appearing to defend the claim and that it was open to the plaintiffs to proceed by way of formal proof against him. Mr Barter then sought leave to withdraw as counsel for Mr Andrews, which I granted.
Formulation of claim
[5] The plaintiffs received 25 proofs of debt in the liquidation amounting to
$1,102,863.41 with a date range shown in the table below:
| Creditor | Amount owed | Date range of debt |
| Aherne Electrical | $370.30 |
Continue reading Grant v Johnston
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Grant v Johnston [2015] NZHC 611
- Case
- [2015] NZHC 611
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.