Gavigan v Disputes Tribunal
[2025] NZHC 3512
•19 November 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND HAMILTON REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA KIRIKIRIROA ROHE
CIV-2024-419-0353
[2025] NZHC 3512
UNDER the Judicial Review Procedure Act 2016 BETWEEN
ANTHONY JOHN GAVIGAN
Applicant
AND
DISPUTES TRIBUNAL, DISTRICT COURT, HAMILTON
First respondent
GILLOVIC MANAGEMENT LIMITED
Second respondent
Hearing: On the papers Appearances:
Applicant in person
A J Nolan for second respondent
Date of judgment:
19 November 2025
JUDGMENT OF JAGOSE J
[Costs]
This judgment was delivered by me on 19 November 2025 at 3.30pm.
Pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules.
………………………… Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Solicitors:
Nolan & Lu Lawyers, Hamilton Crown Law, Wellington
Copy to:
Applicant
GAVIGAN v DISPUTES TRIBUNAL - Costs [2025] NZHC 3512 [19 November 2025]
[1] My 25 September 2025 judgment dismissed Mr Gavigan’s application for judicial review of a Disputes Tribunal decision.1
[2] As the successful party, Gillovic Management Limited seeks $9,840.45 in 2B costs and disbursements. Contending “[t]he issues were technical and novel and arose during application of special Covid regulations under the Companies Act 1993”, and the costs sought disproportionate to what was in dispute, Mr Gavigan submits expenses should be borne by the party incurring them, having regard for what he alleges was Gillovic Management’s “abuse of process” in prosecuting its claim in the Disputes Tribunal.
[3] The ‘abuse’ alleged by Mr Gavigan plainly was not accepted by the Disputes Tribunal.2 “All matters [relating to costs] are at the discretion of the court”,3 but usually for determination in accordance with general principle. I see no reason here to divert from the general principles “the party who fails with respect to a proceeding or an interlocutory application should pay costs to the party who succeeds”,4 and “so far as possible the determination of costs should be predictable and expeditious”.5
[4] I order Mr Gavigan pay Gillovic Management Limited $9,840.45 in costs and disbursements.
—Jagose J
1 Gavigan v Disputes Tribunal [2025] NZHC 2791 at [15].
2 At [13].
3 High Court Rules 2016, r 14.1(1).
4 Rule 14.2(1)(a).
5 Rule 14.2(1)(g).
0
1
1