Gavigan v Disputes Tribunal

Case

[2025] NZHC 3512

19 November 2025

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND HAMILTON REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA KIRIKIRIROA ROHE

CIV-2024-419-0353

[2025] NZHC 3512

UNDER the Judicial Review Procedure Act 2016

BETWEEN

ANTHONY JOHN GAVIGAN

Applicant

AND

DISPUTES TRIBUNAL, DISTRICT COURT, HAMILTON

First respondent

GILLOVIC MANAGEMENT LIMITED

Second respondent

Hearing: On the papers

Appearances:

Applicant in person

A J Nolan for second respondent

Date of judgment:

19 November 2025


JUDGMENT OF JAGOSE J

[Costs]


This judgment was delivered by me on 19 November 2025 at 3.30pm.

Pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules.

………………………… Registrar/Deputy Registrar

Solicitors:

Nolan & Lu Lawyers, Hamilton Crown Law, Wellington

Copy to:
Applicant

GAVIGAN v DISPUTES TRIBUNAL - Costs [2025] NZHC 3512 [19 November 2025]

[1]                 My 25 September 2025 judgment dismissed Mr Gavigan’s application for judicial review of a Disputes Tribunal decision.1

[2]                 As the successful party, Gillovic Management Limited seeks $9,840.45 in 2B costs and disbursements. Contending “[t]he issues were technical and novel and arose during application of special Covid regulations under the Companies Act 1993”, and the costs sought disproportionate to what was in dispute, Mr Gavigan submits expenses should be borne by the party incurring them, having regard for what he alleges was Gillovic Management’s “abuse of process” in prosecuting its claim in the Disputes Tribunal.

[3]                 The ‘abuse’ alleged by Mr Gavigan plainly was not accepted by the Disputes Tribunal.2 “All matters [relating to costs] are at the discretion of the court”,3 but usually for determination in accordance with general principle. I see no reason here to divert from the general principles “the party who fails with respect to a proceeding or an interlocutory application should pay costs to the party who succeeds”,4 and “so far as possible the determination of costs should be predictable and expeditious”.5

[4]                 I order Mr Gavigan pay Gillovic Management Limited $9,840.45 in costs and disbursements.

—Jagose J


1      Gavigan v Disputes Tribunal [2025] NZHC 2791 at [15].

2 At [13].

3      High Court Rules 2016, r 14.1(1).

4      Rule 14.2(1)(a).

5      Rule 14.2(1)(g).

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

1