Fowler Developments Limited v Robertson
[2012] NZHC 2215
•30 August 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY
CIV-2009-409-000454 [2012] NZHC 2215
BETWEEN FOWLER DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED Plaintiff
ANDCRAIG JAMES ROBERTSON First Defendant
ANDPETER JOHN CARR AND TINA MARIA CARR
Third Defendant
ANDNEW ZEALAND HOME BONDS LIMITED
Fourth Defendant
AND(PROCEEDING DISCONTINUED AGAINST SECOND DEFENDANT)
Hearing: On the Papers
Counsel: G Brodie for Plaintiff
D Lester for Third defendants
J Moss for Fourth Defendant
Judgment: 30 August 2012
JUDGMENT OF FOGARTY J
This judgment was delivered by Justice Fogarty on
30 August 2012 at 11.30 a.m., pursuant to r 11.5 of the High Court Rules
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Date:
Solicitors:
G M Brodie, PO Box 130121, Armagh, Christchurch 8141
D Lester, PO Box 9344, ChristchurchJ Moss, PO Box 17-709, Christchurch 8081
Copy to: Craig James Robertson, 2 Shammys Place, Brooklands, Christchurch
FOWLER DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED V ROBERTSON HC CHCH CIV-2009-409-000454 [30 August 2012]
[1] The third defendants seek costs on a 2B basis of $30,220. They seek disbursements incorporating filing fees and a contribution to photocopying of $200. That application was first made on 25 June 2012. On 27 June the fourth defendant sought costs on a 2B basis similarly calculated at $33,132 with disbursements at
$184.
[2] On 26 June I invited submissions from the plaintiff by a minute. Then by a second minute on 29 June I gave the plaintiff until the end of July to file submissions.
[3] In the meantime the plaintiff has appealed the judgment decision.
[4] I have been advised by the Registry on 29 August that there have been no costs submissions filed by the plaintiff. That advice contains in it that there have been no costs submissions received by the applicants from the plaintiff.
[5] There will be costs orders in terms of the applications recored above.
0
0
0