IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE
CIV-2023-404-1064
[2023] NZHC 2118
UNDER Part 15 of the Companies Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF
An application for orders approving a scheme of arrangement under part 15 of the Companies Act 1993
BETWEEN
FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LIMTIED
Applicant
Hearing: On the papers Appearances:
K M Massey and H M Bain for the Applicant
Judgment:
9 August 2023
JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE SUSSOCK
This judgment was delivered by me on 9 August 2023 at 4.30 pm pursuant to r 11.5 of the High Court Rules
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Solicitors:
Russell McVeagh, Auckland
RE FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LTD [2023] NZHC [2118]
Introduction
On 26 May 2023, Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited (Fonterra) filed an originating application for orders approving a scheme of arrangement between Fonterra and its shareholders under part 15 of the Companies Act 1993 (Scheme). The Scheme is intended to return approximately $800 million of capital to shareholders by way of share repurchase and cancellation together with contemporaneous share subdivision so that following the return of capital, the shareholders will still hold the same number of shares.
I made Initial Orders on 9 June 2023 to facilitate service and the consideration of and voting on the Scheme by Fonterra’s Shareholders (9 June Judgment).1 The 9 June Judgment details the background and rationale for the Scheme.
At Fonterra’s request, the Initial Orders were amended in certain respects by my minute dated 11 July 2023. In this judgment references to the Initial Orders are to the Initial Orders as revised on 11 July 2023.
The Initial Orders included orders directing Fonterra to:
(a)convene a special meeting of Shareholders in order for shareholders to consider and vote on the Scheme (Scheme Meeting);
(b)at the Scheme Meeting, put forward for Shareholders’ consideration a resolution approving the Scheme (Resolution); and
(c)in advance of the Scheme Meeting, distribute certain materials to Fonterra’s Shareholders informing them about the Scheme, notifying them of the Scheme Meeting and providing instructions as to how to vote (whether at the Scheme Meeting, online or by post) (Shareholder Materials).
1 Re Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd [2023] NZHC 1438. See definition of Shareholders at [9]. Other capitalised terms are as defined in this judgment or in the 9 June Judgment.
Fonterra’s Shareholders have now voted on the proposed Scheme with 99.24 per cent of the Shareholders entitled to vote and voting on the Resolution voting in favour of the Scheme, well in excess of the threshold of 75 per cent for approval required by the Initial Orders.
No notice of opposition or appearance has been filed or served in accordance with the timetable set out in the Initial Orders or at all.
Following a request from counsel for Fonterra, I issued a minute on 8 August 2023 vacating the hearing for the Final Orders Application scheduled for today, 9 August 2023, and instead…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Fonterra Co-Operative Group Limited and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2023] NZHC 2118
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This case demonstrates the court's role in reviewing and approving schemes of arrangement under the Companies Act 1993. The court carefully considered the statutory requirements, fairness, and overall reasonableness of the proposed scheme before granting its approval. The outcome highlights the broad discretion afforded to the court in determining whether to sanction a scheme of arrangement that aims to restructure a company's capital and rights of its shareholders.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.