Falaniko v Police
[2019] NZHC 2222
•5 September 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE
CRI-2019-409-000072
[2019] NZHC 2222
BETWEEN VENASIO FALANIKO
Appellant
AND
NEW ZEALAND POLICE
Respondent
Hearing: 5 September 2019 Appearances:
Appellant in person
S Bicknell for Respondent
Judgment:
5 September 2019
RESULTS JUDGMENT OF DUNNINGHAM J
[1] Mr Falaniko, I am going to tell you the outcome now and I will write some reasons and you will get it in writing later on.
[2]I am going to allow your appeal. That means that you win.
[3] You are not going to have your car confiscated. I am going to set that order aside. That is because there is a provision here that says if you are going to get an alcohol interlock, or if the Judge made an order that you can get an alcohol interlock, then the Court cannot make an order to confiscate.1
Solicitors:
Raymond Donnelly & Co., Christchurch
1 Sentencing Act 2002, s 129(4)(b).
FALANIKO v NEW ZEALAND POLICE [2019] NZHC 2222 [5 September 2019]
0
0
0