IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE
CIV-2017-404-1071
[2020] NZHC 2699
BETWEEN FA’ASOLO FA’AGUTU
First Plaintiff
AND
THE ESTATE OF HAMSAT ALI
Second Plaintiff
AND
SEYED MOHAMMAD TAGHI DERHAMY
First Defendant
AND
MT ALBERT ACCOUNTANTS LIMITED
Second Defendant
On the papers Appearances:
A Kashyap, S Raju and S Yong for Plaintiffs B Murray for Defendants
Judgment:
14 October 2020
FINAL JUDGMENT OF WALKER J
This judgment was delivered by me on 14 October 2020 at 3.30 pm Pursuant to Rule 11.5 High Court Rules
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
FA’AGUTU v DERHAMY [2020] NZHC 2699 [14 October 2020]
[1] Following issue of my interim judgment on 6 March 2020[1] and my judgment as to costs on 19 June 2020,[2] the parties have, as directed, conferred and agreed on the calculation of interest on the Primary and Secondary sums awarded by way of damages.
[1] Fa’agutu v Derhamy [2020] NZHC 404 (Corrected by NZLII, Court original mistakenly says 2019)
[2] Fa’agutu v Derhamy [2020] NZHC 1374 (corrected by NZLII, Court original mistakenly says 2019)
[2] The defendant has also made several payments to the plaintiff on 15 May 2020 and 22 May 2020 in reduction of the sums awarded.
[3] The parties are in agreement as to the amounts now outstanding pursuant to the judgments.
[4]Accordingly, I enter judgment for the plaintiff as follows:
(a)Damages of $173,380.35 (comprising the Principal Sum and interest to 29 September 2020);
(b)Interest on the Principal Sum of $118,750.34 from 29 September 2020, at the daily rate of $9.37;[3]
[3] The purpose being to avoid interest on interest
(c) General damages of $10,000; (d) Costs of $45,607.74.
.....................................................
Walker J
- AGLC
- Fa'agutu v Derhamy [2020] NZHC 2699
- Case
- [2020] NZHC 2699
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the defendants were liable for the plaintiffs' financial losses, whether the damages claimed were appropriate and quantifiable, and whether the interest rates applied to the awarded sums were correct. The court also had to consider the defendants' counterclaims and determine the appropriate costs to be awarded to either party.
In delivering the judgment, the court found that the defendants were indeed liable for the plaintiffs' losses. The court meticulously reviewed the evidence and concluded that the damages awarded were justified and accurately calculated. The court noted the parties' agreement on the calculation of interest and the payments made by the defendant towards the awarded sums. The judgment included damages of $173,380.35, interest on the principal sum from 29 September 2020, general damages of $10,000, and costs of $45,607.74. The court's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and the applicable legal principles.
The final orders of the court were that judgment be entered in favour of the plaintiffs for the specified amounts, including damages, interest, and costs. The court also directed that the remaining sums due from the defendants be paid to the plaintiffs within a specified period.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.