IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE
CIV-2024-485-779
[2024] NZHC 3570
AN APPLICATION UNDER Section 14 of the Wills Act 2007 IN THE MATTER OF
The Estate of David Gordon Wade
BY
JOANNE BARBARA KAKE
Applicant
On the Papers Counsel:
J W Tucker for the Applicant
Judgment:
27 November 2024
JUDGMENT OF GWYN J
Introduction
[1] The applicant, Joanne Barbara Kake, has made a without notice application under s 14 of the Wills Act 2007, for an order declaring a document to be a valid will. Ms Kake is the daughter of the deceased, David Gordon Wade, who died at Timaru on or about 14 July 2023.
How the document came to be
[2] The Court has received affidavits in support of the application from Ms Kake and Hugh Perry, of Timaru, solicitor, who prepared the document sought to be declared a valid will.
[3] The deceased had executed a will on 30 October 1981 (earlier will). The executors named in that will predeceased the deceased. The persons with a beneficial
RE THE ESTATE OF WADE [2024] NZHC 3570 [27 November 2024]
interest in the earlier will are Ms Kake and her siblings David James Wade, Sonya Marie Wade and Mellissa Helen Peneamene, who are the children of the deceased.
[4] Following a diagnosis of terminal cancer, on 6 July 2023 the deceased instructed his lawyer, Mr Perry, to prepare a new will which was to include such of his children, his stepchildren and his ex-wife living at his death as the residuary beneficiaries of his estate.
[5] Mr Perry prepared a new will for Mr Wade. Mr Perry’s evidence is that when he met Mr Wade on 6 July 2023 Mr Wade was clear, lucid and adamant in his instructions for the will. Mr Perry says those instructions are clearly reflected in the draft will he prepared. He has annexed his note of those instructions to his affidavit. Mr Perry had no communication with the deceased to indicate any change of mind or heart up to 13 July 2023 when he attended on him at his home with a view to having his will signed.
[6] Both Ms Kake and Mr Perry deposed that the deceased’s health declined rapidly, and he was not able to sign the new will as arranged, on 13 July 2023, his mental capacity being affected.
[7] The application relates to the new, unsigned will which was prepared in accordance with the deceased’s instructions. The unsigned will provides as follows:
(a)Joanne Kake is appointed as sole executrix and trustees and in substitution the deceased’s son David Wade, in the event Joanne was unable or unwilling to act.
(b)The estate was to be left equally between such of his children and stepchildren and his ex-wife as survived him.
(c)The deceased was to be cremated, with his ashes scattered as directed by his trustee.
The law
[8] Originating applications may be made without notice where a…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Estate of Wade and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] NZHC 3570
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the unsigned document could be declared a valid will under the Wills Act 2007. The legal issues included whether the document complied with the statutory requirements for a will, specifically the signing requirement, and whether the document reflected Wade's testamentary intentions. The court also needed to assess whether the application could proceed without notice, given the consent of the affected parties and the potential for unnecessary cost and delay.
The court found that the unsigned document met the statutory requirements for a will, despite not being signed by Wade. The court considered the document to be a will based on its content and description, it did not comply with the signing requirement, and it was created in New Zealand. Furthermore, the court found that the document expressed Wade's testamentary intentions based on the evidence provided by Kake and Perry. The court noted that this was an analogous situation to previous cases where the court had validated unsigned wills. Therefore, the court concluded that the document was a valid expression of Wade's intentions and made an order declaring it to be his last will.
In summary, the High Court granted the application and declared the unsigned document to be the valid last will of David Gordon Wade.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.