Estate of Peryer
[2020] NZHC 1802
•23 July 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE
CIV-2020-485-307
[2020] NZHC 1802
IN THE MATTER of Section 14 of the Wills Act 2007 AND
IN THE MATTER
of an application by CLOVIS EUGENE PERYER for an order that a document be
declared a valid will of the deceased PETER CHANEL PERYER
On the papers Counsel:
C B Wilkinson for Applicant
Judgment:
23 July 2020
JUDGMENT OF SIMON FRANCE J
[1] This is an application under s 14 of the Wills Act 2007 to declare a document a valid will of Mr Peter Chanel Peryer. The document is handwritten and purports to be a will. It is witnessed by two persons but does not on its face record that each witness attested the will in the presence of each other.
[2] Evidence is filed on this application by the two witnesses and a third person who was present. All confirm that the two witnesses were present at the same time. In terms of s 14 of the Act there are no circumstances that suggest the document does not contain the testamentary wishes of Mr Peryer.
[3] Pursuant to s 14 of the Wills Act 2007, I declare the document appended to the affidavit of Clovis Eugene Peryer, dated 14 February 2020, and annexed as Annexure A to be a valid will of Mr Peter Chanel Peryer.
Re Estate of Peter Chanel Peryer [2020] NZHC 1802 [23 July 2020]
[4] I draw the parties’ attention to s 13 of the Wills Act. A disposition contained within the document is to one of the two witnesses. The disposition is therefore void, although s 13(2) identifies avenues of relief. The fact that a beneficiary is a witness does not invalidate the will, just the particular disposition. I accordingly did not consider this irregularity affected the s 14 application.
[5] I make the necessary preliminary orders that the application may be made without notice to any person. All parties affected by the issue have consented to the s 14 application.
Simon France J
Solicitors:
RMY Legal, New Plymouth for Applicant
0
0
0