IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
CIV-2012-404-5852 [2012] NZHC 2914
IN THE MATTER OF the Wills Act 2007 and the Administration
Act 1969
AND
IN THE MATTER OF LOO SHE NG, deceased
Hearing: On the Papers
Counsel: J Wickes for Applicant
Judgment: 8 November 2012
JUDGMENT OF KATZ J
In accordance with r 11.5 High Court Rules
I direct the Registrar to endorse this judgment with a delivery time of 3 p.m. on 8 November 2012.
Solicitors: Loo & Koo, Auckland – aloo@loo-koo.co.nz
LOO SHE NG HC AK CIV-2012-404-5852 [8 November 2012]
[1] This is a “without notice” application for an order under s 14 of the Wills Act
2007 to declare valid an unexecuted will of Loo She Ng (“Mrs Ng”). The application is supported by two affidavits from Hine Ng, Mrs Ng’s only child, as well as an affidavit and a memorandum from Mr Arthur Loo who was Mrs Ng’s legal adviser for some 20 years until the time of her death.
[2] The facts, as they appear from Mr Loo’s affidavit, are as follows.
[3] Mrs Ng had one child, a son, Hine Ng. She also had a sister, Baolian Lu (who resides in China) and three brothers. Her brothers Shaochen Lu and Shaoting Lu reside in New Zealand. Her brother Shoguang Lu resides in China.
[4] On 3 June 2010 Mr Loo visited Mrs Ng at her home and she gave him instructions to prepare a will for her. He told her he would go back to his office, prepare the will in terms of her instructions and come back to see her with the completed will and two witnesses in order for the will to be signed and witnessed.
[5] On Mr Loo’s return to the office he drafted a will in terms of Mrs Ng’s instructions. He intended to take a legal executive at his office who speaks Chinese, together with another employee, back with him to Mrs Ng’s home in order to witness the will. However, shortly after his visit to Mrs Ng, the legal executive concerned became seriously ill and Mr Loo put the matter aside until her health improved. Unfortunately he then forgot about the matter and Mrs Ng died on 21 November
2011 without the will having been signed. Mr Loo’s evidence is that he is convinced the unexecuted will which he has annexed to his affidavit reflects Mrs Ng’s wishes. He has also provided the Court with a copy of the handwritten notes he made at the meeting with Mrs Ng, which are consistent with the draft will.
[6] Mr Loo has advertised in The Law News to see whether Mrs Ng had another will but there has been no response to that advertisement. Accordingly it is his belief that the draft will he prepared is Mrs Ng’s last will and testament.
[7] This application is made “without notice” to any other party. The first question therefore is whether that course is appropriate or whether there…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Estate of Ng and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2012] NZHC 2914
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the unsigned will complied with section 14 of the Wills Act 2007, which allows the High Court to declare a document valid if it appears to be a will, does not comply with formal requirements, and expresses the deceased's testamentary intentions. The court needed to ascertain if the evidence presented by Mr Loo and Hine Ng sufficiently demonstrated that the draft will reflected Mrs Ng’s testamentary wishes. Additionally, the court had to consider whether proper notice should have been given to other potential beneficiaries, specifically Mrs Ng's siblings.
The court found that the application could proceed without notice to other parties as it was unlikely that any other person would be prejudiced by the outcome. The document in question appeared to be a will and did not comply with the formal requirements of being signed and witnessed. The court was satisfied that the document expressed Mrs Ng’s testamentary intentions based on Mr Loo’s affidavit and the contemporaneous notes he made during his meeting with Mrs Ng. Hine Ng’s affidavit further supported the contention that the draft will represented his mother’s wishes, and he confirmed his support for the application after taking independent legal advice.
In conclusion, the court declared the unsigned will valid as the last will of Mrs Loo She Ng, finding that it accurately reflected her testamentary intentions. The draft will, marked as “A” and attached to Mr Loo’s affidavit, was accepted as the valid will of the deceased.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.