Estate of Ng

Link copied
Case Copied 6 min read

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY

CIV-2012-404-5852 [2012] NZHC 2914

IN THE MATTER OF     the Wills Act 2007 and the Administration

Act 1969

AND

IN THE MATTER OF      LOO SHE NG, deceased

Hearing:         On the Papers

Counsel:         J Wickes for Applicant

Judgment:      8 November 2012

JUDGMENT OF KATZ J

In accordance with r 11.5 High Court Rules

I direct the Registrar to endorse this judgment with a delivery time of 3 p.m. on 8 November 2012.

Solicitors:           Loo & Koo, Auckland – aloo@loo-koo.co.nz

LOO SHE NG HC AK CIV-2012-404-5852 [8 November 2012]

[1]      This is a “without notice” application for an order under s 14 of the Wills Act

2007  to  declare  valid  an  unexecuted  will  of  Loo  She  Ng  (“Mrs  Ng”).    The application is supported by two affidavits from Hine Ng, Mrs Ng’s only child, as well as an affidavit and a memorandum from Mr Arthur Loo who was Mrs Ng’s legal adviser for some 20 years until the time of her death.

[2]      The facts, as they appear from Mr Loo’s affidavit, are as follows.

[3]      Mrs Ng had one child, a son, Hine Ng.   She also had a sister, Baolian Lu (who resides in China) and three brothers.  Her brothers Shaochen Lu and Shaoting Lu reside in New Zealand.  Her brother Shoguang Lu resides in China.

[4]      On 3 June 2010 Mr Loo visited Mrs Ng at her home and she gave him instructions to prepare a will for her.  He told her he would go back to his office, prepare the will in terms of her instructions and come back to see her with the completed will and two witnesses in order for the will to be signed and witnessed.

[5]      On Mr Loo’s return to the office he drafted a will in terms of Mrs Ng’s instructions.  He intended to take a legal executive at his office who speaks Chinese, together with another employee, back with him to Mrs Ng’s home in order to witness the will.  However, shortly after his visit to Mrs Ng, the legal executive concerned became seriously ill and Mr Loo put the matter aside until her health improved. Unfortunately he then forgot about the matter and Mrs Ng died on 21 November

2011 without the will having been signed.  Mr Loo’s evidence is that he is convinced the unexecuted will which he has annexed to his affidavit reflects Mrs Ng’s wishes. He has also provided the Court with a copy of the handwritten notes he made at the meeting with Mrs Ng, which are consistent with the draft will.

[6]      Mr Loo has advertised in The Law News to see whether Mrs Ng had another will but there has been no response to that advertisement. Accordingly it is his belief that the draft will he prepared is Mrs Ng’s last will and testament.

[7]      This  application  is  made  “without  notice”  to  any other  party.    The  first question therefore is whether that course is appropriate or whether there…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Estate of Ng and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2012] NZHC 2914
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves an application for the declaration of validity of an unsigned will of the deceased, Loo She Ng, under section 14 of the Wills Act 2007. The application was brought by Arthur Loo, Mrs Ng’s legal adviser, and is supported by affidavits from Mrs Ng’s son, Hine Ng, and Mr Loo himself. The court was tasked with determining whether the unsigned will prepared by Mr Loo in accordance with Mrs Ng’s instructions should be recognised as her last will and testament.

The primary legal issue was whether the unsigned will complied with section 14 of the Wills Act 2007, which allows the High Court to declare a document valid if it appears to be a will, does not comply with formal requirements, and expresses the deceased's testamentary intentions. The court needed to ascertain if the evidence presented by Mr Loo and Hine Ng sufficiently demonstrated that the draft will reflected Mrs Ng’s testamentary wishes. Additionally, the court had to consider whether proper notice should have been given to other potential beneficiaries, specifically Mrs Ng's siblings.

The court found that the application could proceed without notice to other parties as it was unlikely that any other person would be prejudiced by the outcome. The document in question appeared to be a will and did not comply with the formal requirements of being signed and witnessed. The court was satisfied that the document expressed Mrs Ng’s testamentary intentions based on Mr Loo’s affidavit and the contemporaneous notes he made during his meeting with Mrs Ng. Hine Ng’s affidavit further supported the contention that the draft will represented his mother’s wishes, and he confirmed his support for the application after taking independent legal advice.

In conclusion, the court declared the unsigned will valid as the last will of Mrs Loo She Ng, finding that it accurately reflected her testamentary intentions. The draft will, marked as “A” and attached to Mr Loo’s affidavit, was accepted as the valid will of the deceased.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.