Estate of Finch

Case [2025] NZHC 2444


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE

CIV-2025-485-608087

[2025] NZHC 2444

UNDER the Administration Act 1969 and Part 27 of the High Court Rules 2016

IN THE MATTER

of the Estate of BRIAN ALEXANDER FINCH

Hearing: On the Papers

Counsel:

T D Bloy for Applicants D M Kerr for Respondent

Judgment:

26 August 2025


JUDGMENT OF ISAC J

[Appointment of temporary administrator]


[1]                  In this proceeding the applicants, Ms Angelique Carter and Mr Kyle Broderick, seek an order appointing temporary administrators of the estate of Mr Brian Alexander Finch. Mr Finch died on 21 November 2024, leaving a widow, Mrs Janice Finch. The applicants are Mr Finch’s adult children of a previous marriage.

[2]                  There is a contest between the parties as to the administration of the estate. Mrs Finch applied for an order that  letters  of  administration  be  granted  to  her. Ms Carter and Mr Broderick then applied for an order appointing Mr Nigel Philip Smith and Mr Marcus Eldon Diprose temporary administrators of the estate. They said that Mrs Finch is not suitable to administer the estate and that it is not being properly managed.

Estate of BRIAN ALEXANDER FINCH [2025] NZHC 2444 [26 August 2025]

[3]                  Grice J declined to make an order appointing the temporary administrators without notice, and directed that Mrs Finch file a notice of opposition and supporting affidavit.

[4]                  Since that determination, on 15 August 2025 the parties filed a joint memorandum advising the Court that they agree to appoint Michael Charles Morgan, director of Carlile Dowling Lawyers in Napier, to act as an independent and professional administrator of the estate on an urgent and temporary basis under s 7 of the Administration Act 1969. In an affidavit provided to the Court, Mr Morgan confirmed he is willing to accept appointment and faithfully administer the estate.

[5]Section 7 of the Administration Act 1969 provides:

7        Administration pending legal proceedings

(1)Where any legal proceedings touching the validity of the will of a deceased person, or for obtaining, recalling, or revoking any grant of administration, are pending, the court may grant administration of the estate of the deceased to a temporary administrator, who shall, until he or she is discharged or removed under section 21, have all the rights and powers of a general administrator, other than the right of distributing the balance of the estate remaining after payment of debts, funeral and testamentary expenses, duties, and fees, and every such temporary administrator shall be subject to the immediate control of the court and act under its direction.

(2)The court may, out of the estate of the deceased, grant to a temporary administrator appointed under this section such reasonable remuneration as the court thinks fit.

[6]                  Whata J in Re Estate of McCue in considering a s 7 application proceeded on the basis that:1

(1)There must be a legal proceeding touching the validity of the will of a deceased person or a grant of administration;


1      Re Estate of McCue [2015] NZHC 1271 at [11] cited in De Greogorio v Surridge [2017] NZHC 2061, at [4].

(2)It must be necessary to grant an order for interim administration to preserve and manage the assets of the estate pending the resolution of the proceedings; and

(3)The proposed appointee must be suitably qualified to perform the tasks of the administrator and must have sworn to faithfully administer the estate.

[7]                  I am clearly satisfied there is a legal proceeding touching the grant of administration. It is also clear on the material before the Court that it is necessary to appoint an interim administrator to preserve and manage the assets of Mr Finch’s estate pending resolution of the proceedings. In particular, it is necessary to ensure that insurance can be obtained over the estate and Mr Finch’s company’s properties and to pay the estate’s debts. I am also satisfied that Mr Morgan is suitably qualified to perform the tasks of the administrator.

[8]                  Accordingly, I make the orders in the terms sought in the joint memorandum dated 15 August 2025, namely:

(1)An order pursuant to s 7(1) of the Administration Act 1969 that administration of the estate of Brian Alexander Finch be granted to Michael Charles Morgan of Carlile Dowling Lawyers as temporary administrator under s 7 of the Administration Act, until determination of the present proceedings or further order of the Court; and

(2)that Michael Charles Morgan be remunerated out of the deceased’s estate for his reasonable costs of carrying out his duties as temporary administrator.

Isac J

Solicitors:

Evolution Lawyers, Auckland for Applicants Bisson Moss, Napier for Respondent

Details
AGLC
Estate of Finch [2025] NZHC 2444
Case
[2025] NZHC 2444
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, Ms Angelique Carter and Mr Kyle Broderick, sought an order to appoint temporary administrators of the estate of Mr Brian Alexander Finch, who passed away on 21 November 2024. The applicants are Mr Finch's adult children from a previous marriage. There was a dispute over the administration of the estate between the applicants and the deceased's widow, Mrs Janice Finch, who also applied for an order to grant her letters of administration. The applicants argued that Mrs Finch was unsuitable to manage the estate and that it was not being properly handled. The court had to decide whether to appoint temporary administrators and who should be appointed.

The primary legal issue was whether it was necessary to appoint a temporary administrator to manage the estate of Mr Finch during the proceedings. The court had to consider the criteria set out in section 7 of the Administration Act 1969 and the case law on interim administration. The applicants had to demonstrate that there was a legal proceeding touching the grant of administration, that it was necessary to appoint an interim administrator to preserve and manage the assets of the estate, and that the proposed appointee was suitably qualified. The court had to determine whether the applicants met these criteria and whether the proposed appointee, Mr Michael Charles Morgan, was suitable for the role.

The court found that there was a legal proceeding touching the grant of administration, and it was necessary to appoint an interim administrator to preserve and manage the assets of Mr Finch's estate. The court was satisfied that Mr Morgan was suitably qualified to perform the tasks of the administrator and had sworn to faithfully administer the estate. The court made the orders sought in the joint memorandum dated 15 August 2025, appointing Mr Morgan as a temporary administrator of the estate. The court also ordered that Mr Morgan be remunerated out of the deceased's estate for his reasonable costs of carrying out his duties.

The court ordered that administration of the estate of Brian Alexander Finch be granted to Michael Charles Morgan of Carlile Dowling Lawyers as a temporary administrator under section 7 of the Administration Act 1969 until the determination of the present proceedings or further order of the Court. The court also ordered that Mr Morgan be remunerated out of the deceased's estate for his reasonable costs of carrying out his duties as temporary administrator.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.