Eriwata-Skelton v Eriwata

Case [2022] NZHC 2933


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND NEW PLYMOUTH REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA NGĀMOTU ROHE

CIV-2021-443-50

[2022] NZHC 2933

UNDER The Administration Act 1969

IN THE MATTER

of the Estate of MOANA JANE ERIWATA

BETWEEN

LOGAN ERIWATA-SKELTON

Plaintiff

AND

DONNA MARIA ERIWATA

Defendant

Hearing: On the Papers

Counsel:

C A Silk for Plaintiff

Judgment:

9 November 2022


JUDGMENT OF ISAC J


[1]                 This proceeding concerns an application by Mr Skelton to remove Ms Eriwata as Executor and Trustee of the late Moana Jane Eriwata’s estate.

[2]                 The relevant background is succinctly set out in an interim judgment of Ellis J of 30 June 2022.1  Her  Honour  was  satisfied  that  it  was  expedient  to  remove  Ms Eriwata as Executor and Trustee,2 but given  the fraught  relationship  between Mr Skelton and Ms Eriwata, considered it would be more appropriate to appoint an independent executor and trustee.3

[3]Her Honour then directed:


1      Skelton v Eriwata [2022] NZHC 1546 at [1]-[9].

2 At [13].

3      At [15]-[16].

ERIWATA-SKELTON v ERIWATA [2022] NZHC 2933 [9 November 2022]

[16] …

(a)Mrs Smith, in consultation with her client, is to identify an independent suitably qualified person, who is willing to take appointment as Executor and Trustee of Moana Eriwata’s estate;

(b)Once that has occurred, she is to formally notify the Court (by way of memorandum marked for my attention) of:

(i)the identity of this person and his or her preparedness to accept appointment;

(ii)the terms upon which he or she proposes he should be appointed;

(iii)information as to his or her background and relevant experience.

[17] On receipt of that material, and assuming that it is satisfactory, a final judgment will follow, removing Donna Eriwata as Executor and Trustee of the estate of Moana Eriwata and making a replacement appointment.

[20] This judgment is not to be sealed until such time as that material is to hand and a minute has been issued directing the Registrar to permit sealing.

[4]                 Following Ellis J’s decision, Ms Silk filed a memorandum of counsel accompanied by affidavit of Ms Catherine Quin.  Those  documents  confirm  that Ms Quin is an experienced estate solicitor in New Plymouth, who is prepared to undertake the role of Executor and Trustee of the estate.

[5]                 As Ellis J is currently unavailable to consider the matter, the proceeding has been referred to me as Duty Judge for determination.

[6]                 Having considered both the terms of Ellis J’s judgment, and Ms Quin’s affidavit, I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make the order appointing Ms Quin Executor and Trustee of the estate. I make the order accordingly.

[7]Leave to apply is reserved. The file is to be referred to Ellis J in due course.

Isac J

Solicitors:

Legal Plus, New Plymouth for Plaintiff

Details
AGLC
Eriwata-Skelton v Eriwata [2022] NZHC 2933
Case
[2022] NZHC 2933
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the High Court of New Zealand, in the New Plymouth Registry, the case of Eriwata-Skelton v Eriwata was heard. The dispute involved an application by Logan Eriwata-Skelton to remove Donna Maria Eriwata as Executor and Trustee of the estate of the late Moana Jane Eriwata. The case was heard on the papers with counsel for the plaintiff being C A Silk. The court issued its judgment on 9 November 2022.

The legal issues before the court included whether it was appropriate to remove Ms Eriwata as Executor and Trustee of the estate and to appoint an independent executor and trustee in her place. The court needed to consider the terms upon which the replacement would be appointed, including the proposed terms, background and experience of the replacement. The court also needed to consider whether it was appropriate to reserve leave to apply and to refer the file back to the original judge in due course.

The court found that it was appropriate to remove Ms Eriwata as Executor and Trustee of the estate and to appoint Ms Catherine Quin, an experienced estate solicitor, in her place. The court was satisfied that it was expedient to remove Ms Eriwata and that it would be more appropriate to appoint an independent executor and trustee. The court considered the terms of the appointment, background and experience of Ms Quin, and was satisfied that it was appropriate to make the order appointing her Executor and Trustee of the estate. Leave to apply was reserved, and the file was to be referred back to the original judge in due course.

The final orders of the court were to remove Donna Maria Eriwata as Executor and Trustee of the estate of Moana Jane Eriwata and to appoint Catherine Quin as Executor and Trustee of the estate in her place. The terms of the appointment were to be determined by the parties and the court. Leave to apply was reserved, and the file was to be referred back to the original judge in due course.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.