Emmott v Michael Wilson & Partners Limited

Case

[2017] NZHC 359

7 March 2017

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY

CIV-2016-485-973 [2017] NZHC 359

IN THE MATTER of the Land Transfer Act 1952

BETWEEN

JOHN FORSTER EMMOTT Applicant

AND

MICHAEL WILSON & PARTNERS LIMITED

Respondent

On the papers

Appearances:

A J Knowsley and D Hunt for the applicant
K P Sullivan for the respondent

Judgment:

7 March 2017

COSTS JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE SMITH

[1]      In a judgment given on 20 December 2016, I dismissed an application by Mr Emmott for an order that a caveat lodged by him on the title to certain land in Wellington not lapse.

[2]      In my judgment, I indicated that the respondent was entitled to costs, and expressed a preliminary view that the case was not one where there should be any uplift on standard “2B” costs.   However I did not hear fully from counsel on the question of costs.  I accordingly directed that any memorandum from the respondent seeking costs was to be filed by 31 January 2017, and any reply memorandum by Mr Emmott by 14 February 2017.

[3]      The respondent duly filed a costs memorandum on 31 January 2017.   No costs memorandum has been filed by Mr Emmott.

EMMOTT v MICHAEL WILSON & PARTNERS LIMITED [2017] NZHC 359 [7 March 2017]

[4]      While  the  respondent  initially  submitted  that  increased  costs  should  be awarded, in his memorandum of 31 January 2017 Mr Sullivan accepted that costs on a 2B basis are appropriate.  He submitted a schedule with his memorandum, setting out a 2B costs calculation totalling $9,254.50  plus disbursements (filing fee on notice  of  opposition  and  sealing  fee  on  the  order  made  by the  court)  totalling

$160.00.

[5]      I am satisfied that that claim is correctly made in accordance with schedules 2 and 3 of the High Court Rules.   There will accordingly be judgment for the respondent for costs in the sum of $9,254.50, plus disbursements of $160.00.

Associate Judge Smith

Solicitors:

Rainey Collins, Wellington for the applicant

WCM Legal, Wellington for the respondent

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0