Crown Solicitor v O'Neill

Case

[2012] NZHC 1824

25 July 2012

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY

CIV-2012-404-3687 [2012] NZHC 1824

UNDER  the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009

BETWEEN  CROWN SOLICITOR AT AUCKLAND Applicant

ANDSHARON CLAIRE O'NEILL Respondent

Hearing:         25 July 2012

Appearances: M Harborow for the Applicant

Respondent in person

Judgment:      25 July 2012

(ORAL) JUDGMENT OF THE HON JUSTICE KÓS

Solicitors / Parties:

Mr M Harborow, Meredith Connell, Office of the Crown Solicitor, Auckland

Ms S C O’Neill, Auckland

CROWN SOLICITOR V O'NEILL HC AK CIV-2012-404-3687 [25 July 2012]

[1]      The Crown has applied on notice for restraining orders as follow:

(a)       The  following  property  (Property)  is  not  to  be  disposed  of  or otherwise dealt with other than as is provided for in these orders and is to be in the Official Assignee’s custody and control:

(i)        All interests in the property located at 203 Godley Road, Titirangi, Auckland, described in certificate of title NA16B/67  other  than  the  interest  of  the  Bank  of  New Zealand under mortgage 8262120.3 (Godley Road);

(ii)      The  proceeds  of  the  sale  of  the  property  located  at  23

Beaubank Road, Kelston, Auckland.

(b)       In the event that repayments on the loan secured by the mortgage over Godley Road falls into more than two months arrears, the Official Assignee may sell Godley Road without further order of the Court.  If this occurs, following the repayment of the mortgagee and payment of the Official Assignee’s reasonable costs in effecting the sale, the Official Assignee shall hold the proceeds of sale pending further order of this court.

(c)       In respect of the mortgage over Godley Road, the respondent may not make any further draw downs so as to increase amount currently outstanding under the loan secured by the mortgage.

[2]      Ms O’Neill appears today in person.   She does not oppose the making of these orders.  She understands that these orders hold the position only.  They do not effect a forfeiture.

[3]      Accordingly, orders as sought are made.

Stephen Kós J

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0