Craig v Williams

Case

[2018] NZSC 61

4 July 2018

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

I TE KŌTI MANA NUI

SC 21/2018

[2018] NZSC 61

BETWEEN

COLIN GRAEME CRAIG

Applicant

AND

JORDAN HENRY WILLIAMS

Respondent

Court: Elias CJ, O’Regan and Ellen France JJ

Counsel:

S J Mills QC, J W J Graham and T F Cleary for Applicant P A McKnight and A J Romanos for Respondent

Judgment:

4 July 2018


JUDGMENT OF THE COURT


ALeave to appeal and leave to cross-appeal is granted (Williams v Craig [2018] NZCA 31).

BThe approved question is whether the Court of Appeal erred in allowing the appeal to that Court in part and dismissing the cross-appeal to that Court.


REASONS

[1]  The terms on which leave to appeal and leave  to cross-appeal have been  granted are intended to allow each party to advance the matters raised in their respective applications for leave.

Solicitors:

Chapman Tripp, Auckland for Applicant Langford Law, Wellington for Respondent

COLIN GRAEME CRAIG v JORDAN HENRY WILLIAMS [2018] NZSC 61 [4 July 2018]

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
Stringer v Craig [2018] NZHC 3076

Cases Citing This Decision

4

Craig v Williams [2019] NZSC 38
Craig v Stringer [2019] NZHC 1363
Stringer v Craig [2018] NZHC 3076
Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

0

Williams v Craig [2018] NZCA 31