IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAURANGA REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TAURANGA MOANA ROHE
CIV-2019-470-18
[2019] NZHC 560
UNDER the Trustee Act 1956 IN THE MATTER
of an application for a Vesting Order
BETWEEN
COLLEEN ANNETTE COTTERILL and HOLLAND BECKETT TRUSTEE NO. 10 LIMITED
Applicant
AND
DONALD CECIL COTTERILL
Respondent
On the papers Appearances:
CL Goodspeed for Applicant
Judgment:
25 March 2019
JUDGMENT OF TOOGOOD J
This judgment was delivered by me on 25 March 2019 at 4.00 pm Pursuant to Rule 11.5 High Court Rules
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
COTTERILL and COTTERILL [2019] NZHC 560 [25 March 2019]
Introduction
[1] Colleen Annette Cotterill (“Colleen”) and her husband Donald Cecil Cotterill (“Donald”) were the settlors and trustees of the D C & C A Cotterill Family Trust (“the Trust”), established by deed of trust dated 1 April 2002.
[2] Donald is aged 86. Dr Wael Mohamed, a psychiatrist, said in a report dated 15 October 2018 that Donald suffers from moderately advanced dementia associated with psychotic features, “sun downing” and aggressive behaviour. Colleen’s evidence indicates that Donald’s condition has deteriorated since that report and he is now in full-time residential care in the Dementia Unit at Bob Owens Retirement Village in Tauranga.
[3] Acting under the Clause 12 of the deed of trust, Colleen removed Donald as a trustee of the Trust by deed dated 14 November 2018. Colleen and Holland Beckett Trustee No 10 Limited (“HBT 10”) are the remaining trustees of the Trust.
[4] In their capacities as trustees, Colleen, Donald and HBT 10 are the registered proprietors of residential properties in Tauranga, namely:
(a)the property at 52A 13th Avenue, Tauranga 3112 being all the land contained in CFR Identifier 367842 South Auckland, and being Lot 1 on Deposited Plan 391668; and
(b)the property at 52B 13th Avenue, Tauranga 3112 being all the land contained in CFR Identifier 367843 South Auckland, and being Lot 2 on Deposited Plan 391668
(together, “the Land”).
[5]Colleen and HBT 10 seek orders vesting the Land in the remaining trustees.
Application for leave to commence the proceeding by originating application and directions as to service
[6] This is not the type of proceeding that can be commenced by way of originating application as of right pursuant to rr 19.2 to 19.4 of the High Court Rules 2016. However, the Court may, in the interests of justice, permit any proceeding not mentioned in rules 19.2 to 19.4 to be commenced by originating application. Such permission may be sought without notice.1 The plaintiffs seek leave to bring this proceeding as an originating application under Part 19 of the High Court Rules 2016, and they have asked that the application be determined on the papers without service on any person.
[7] Colleen and Donald are the preferred beneficiaries of the Trust. The final beneficiaries of the Trust are their children, Glenn Charles Cotterill (“Glenn”) and Donald Bruce Cotterill (“Bruce”).
[8] The discretionary beneficiaries of the Trust are the children of the children of the…
Continue reading Cotterill v Cotterill
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Cotterill v Cotterill [2019] NZHC 560
- Case
- [2019] NZHC 560
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the court had jurisdiction to permit the proceeding to be brought as an originating application and whether Donald's advanced dementia constituted a disability under the Trustee Act, thereby allowing the vesting of the properties in the remaining trustees. The court considered the evidence provided, including a psychiatric report confirming Donald's condition, and the consent of the other beneficiaries to the vesting order.
Toogood J held that the proceeding could be brought as an originating application without notice, as there were no disputed questions of fact and no opposing party. The court found that Donald's advanced dementia constituted a disability under the Trustee Act, and it was in the interests of justice to vest the properties in the remaining trustees to facilitate the management and transfer of the titles. The court granted the vesting order, allowing the properties to be held by the remaining trustees of the D C & C A Cotterill Family Trust.
The court's final order was that the proceeding could be commenced by originating application under Part 19 of the High Court Rules 2016, and service of the proceeding was dispensed with. The properties at 52A and 52B 13th Avenue, Tauranga, were vested in Colleen Annette Cotterill and Holland Beckett Trustee No 10 Limited as trustees of the D C & C A Cotterill Family Trust.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.