IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
CIV-2015-404-1821 [2015] NZHC 2815
UNDER Sections 4(1) and 4(5), Judicature
Amendment Act 1972
IN THE MATTER
of the Valuers Act 1948
BETWEEN
KENNETH ROBERT COOKE Plaintiff
AND
VALUERS REGISTRATION BOARD First Defendant
JOHN REID Second Defendant
Hearing: 12 November 2015 Counsel:
Appearance:
RKP Stewart for first defendant
JH Whitehead for second defendantKR Cooke, plaintiff in person
Judgment:
12 November 2015
JUDGMENT OF FAIRE J
This judgment was delivered by me on 12 November 2015 at 4:45 pm, pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules.
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Date……………
Solicitors: Izard Weston, Wellington
DAC Beachcroft New Zealand Ltd, Auckland
And To: RC Cooke, Auckland
Cooke v Valuers Registration Board [2015] NZHC 2815 [12 November 2015]
Contents
The proceeding .......................................................................................................[1] The applications for security for costs ...................................................................[5] The opposition........................................................................................................[6] The court’s approach to security for cost applications ...........................................[7] The threshold issue............................................................................................... [11] Background ..........................................................................................................[12] Analysis ................................................................................................................[21] Orders ...................................................................................................................[30] Costs .....................................................................................................................[31]
The proceeding
[1] The plaintiff has filed this proceeding which invites the court to judicially review a decision of the Valuers Registration Board, notified by letter dated 11 June
2015 and in respect of a complaint the plaintiff made by letter dated 17 August 2014 to the New Zealand Institute of Valuers.
[2] The plaintiff, by implication, pleads that the second defendant, who the New Zealand Institute of Valuers appointed to investigate and report to the Valuers Registration Board in respect of a complaint involving a registered valuer, Mr GJ Clapcott of Albion Banks Valuations Ltd:
(a) Failed to meet the requirements of s 32(1) of the Valuers Act 1948;
and
(b) Produced a report which was not of a sufficient quality to discharge
the second defendant’s professional duty of care.
[3] The plaintiff seeks orders that:
(a) The Valuers Registration Board’s decision not to hold an inquiry into the plaintiff’s complaint about the second defendant’s investigation and report to the Valuers Registration Board be set aside;
(b)Effectively a declaration by the court as to the essential requirements of an investigation in terms of s 31(1) of the Valuers Act 1948;
(c) Effectively a declaration by the court as to whether the second
defendant’s report meets the requirements of the Act;
(d)Effectively a declaration by the court as to whether the second defendant discharged his professional duty of care when he submitted his report to the Valuers Registration Board; and
(e) Effectively a declaration by the court as to whether the Valuers Registration Board properly exercised its statutory powers of decision and properly discharged its professional duty of care in arriving at its decision.
[4] The plaintiff filed his statement of claim on 12 August 2015.
The applications for security for costs
[5] The first and second defendants applied respectively on 10 and 18 September
2015 for orders for security for costs. Directions for the disposal of those applications were made by Peters J in a minute of 24 September 2015, including the allocation of this fixture.
The opposition
[6] The…
Continue reading Cooke v Valuers Registration Board
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Cooke v Valuers Registration Board [2015] NZHC 2815
- Case
- [2015] NZHC 2815
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the legal issues surrounding the application for security for costs, including the threshold issue of whether Cooke was unable to pay the defendants' costs if unsuccessful, and the exercise of the court's discretion in ordering security for costs. The court found that the threshold position was met, as Cooke was impecunious and already significantly indebted to the Valuers Registration Board for costs from a previous judicial review proceeding. The court also considered the public policy principles underlying issue estoppel and the likelihood of success of Cooke's current judicial review application, which was considered to be remote.
The court concluded that it was an appropriate case to order security for costs, and ordered Cooke to pay $18,000 to the Registrar of the High Court as security for costs for the first defendant and $1,500 for the second defendant. Pending payment of the security, the proceeding was to be stayed. Upon payment of the security, the Registrar was to place the proceeding in the judicial review list and notify the parties of the listing. The defendants were entitled to costs based on Category 2 Band B and in respect of a ¼ day hearing, plus disbursements as fixed by the Registrar.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.