Client Trustee Services Limited v Khodaverdi
[2023] NZHC 2884
•13 October 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND DUNEDIN REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA ŌTEPOTI ROHE
CIV-2022-412-92
[2023] NZHC 2884
IN THE MATTER OF The L K Family Trust AND
IN THE MATTER OF
The Trusts Act 2019
AND
UNDER
Part 19 of the High Court Rules 2016
BETWEEN
CLIENT TRUSTEE SERVICES LIMITED
Applicant
AND
LAURA MICHELLE KHODAVERDI
Respondent
Hearing: On the papers Judgment:
13 October 2023
JUDGMENT OF HARLAND J
Application for variation to orders
Introduction
[1] On 7 July 2023, Gendall J made orders to remove Client Trustee Services Limited (CTSL) as trustee of the LK Family Trust and appoint the Public Trust in its place.1
[2] Counsel for the Public Trust filed a memorandum on 6 October 2023 requesting a variation to the orders to allow for the sealing of an order to enable the
1 Client Trustee Services Ltd v Khodaverdi [2023] NZHC 1772.
CLIENT TRUSTEE SERVICES LTD v KHODAVERDI [2023] NZHC 2884 [13 October 2023]
transfer of the property at 45 Hunt Street, Dunedin (the Property) into the name of the Public Trust as replacement trustee. This is because counsel noted:
(a) the Trust was referred to as “the L K Family Trust”, instead of the “L K Trust”; and
(b) the orders do not mention the vesting of the Property in the Public Trust as the replacement trustee pursuant to s 116 of the Trusts Act 2019 (the Trusts Act).
[3] As a result of s 116(5) of the Trusts Act, the provisions of s 116(2)(b) operate as a matter of law which means that the order made by Gendall J, to replace the co- trustee with the Public Trust, automatically vests the property in the Public Trust without the need for any conveyance, transfer or assignment, subject to any liabilities attaching to the property.
[4] I queried therefore whether a variation to the order was required and the Public Trust, in a speedy memorandum in response, has advised that, although sharing this view, the requested variation to the order is to satisfy Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) requirements to enable transfer of the land title. This is because the order must specifically identify the property by title identifier and, as counsel correctly notes, LINZ has no knowledge of what specific property is held by the trust and LINZ does not register the names of trusts on land titles. The order would therefore serve to link the property to the trust.
[5] I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make both of the variations sought; the first under r 11.10 of the High Court Rules 2016 and the second to provide for clarity needed for the purposes of LINZ.
[6]I accordingly vary the judgment of Gendall J of 7 August 2023 by:
(a) amending the references in his judgment to the LK Family Trust to the LK Trust; and
(b) as well as ordering under s 114 of the Trusts Act the replacement of the co-trustee with the Public Trust, specifying an order under s 116 of the
Trust Act that the property at 45 Hunt Street, Dunedin (Title Identifier OT201/253) is vested in the Public Trust as a co-trustee of the LK Trust.
[7]I approve the draft orders dated 7 July 2023 for sealing.
Harland J
0
1
0