Clements v Clements

Case [2018] NZHC 2657


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WHANGAREI REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA WHANGĀREI-TERENGA-PARĀOA ROHE

CIV-2018-488-106 [2018] NZHC 2657

UNDER the Trustee Act 1956

BETWEEN

KEVIN ALLEN CLEMENTS Plaintiff

AND

PHYLLIS IRENE CLEMENTS as a Trsutee of the ERIC AND PHYLLIS CLEMENTS FAMILY TRUST

Defendant

On the papers

Counsel:

AG Jackson for Plaintiff

Judgment:

15 October 2018

JUDGMENT OF TOOGOOD J

This judgment was delivered by me on 15 October 2018 at 4.00 pm

Pursuant to Rule 11.5 High Court Rules

Registrar/Deputy Registrar

CLEMENTS v CLEMENTS [2018] NZHC 2657 [15 October 2018]

[1]      The Eric and Phyllis Clements Family Trust (the Trust) was settled by Phyllis Clements and her husband Eric on 18 April 2002.  The trustees of the Trust were the settlors and Ms Robertson, a financial advisor.  Ms Robertson retired as a trustee on

10 September 2014.   Eric is now deceased.   I am satisfied on the evidence of Dr Cunningham that Phyllis is under a disability and not capable of exercising her powers and duties as sole trustee.

[2]      The beneficiaries of the Trust include the settlors and their son, Kevin Allen Clements.  The final beneficiaries are the settlors’ grandchildren of which there are currently none.

[3]      Under s 51 of the Trustee Act 1956, pursuant to leave granted on 3 October

2018, Kevin has filed an originating application seeking an order replacing Phyllis as the sole surviving trustee of the Trust by professional trustees, YHPJ Trustees (2018) Limited and himself, and an order vesting the trust property in the new trustees. I am satisfied that there is no person other than Phyllis affected by the application and I have dispensed with service of the proceeding on her.

[4]      The affidavit evidence is comprehensive and persuasive and I am satisfied that, although there is a possibility that discretionary beneficiaries may be appointed in the future, there is no present need to take that prospect into account. It follows that I am prepared to make the final orders necessary to put the Trust’s affairs in order, including appointing the new trustees in Phyllis’s place and vesting the trust assets, including the property at 1274 State Highway1, RD2, Hikurangi in which Kevin and Phyllis live, in the new trustees.

[5]      Accordingly, I make the following orders in accordance with counsel’s draft:

(a)pursuant to section 51 of the Trustee Act 1956, Phyllis Irene Clements shall cease to be the Trustee of the Eric and Phyllis Clements Family Trust forthwith;

(b)      simultaneously with part (a) of the Order above, and pursuant to section

51 of the Trustee Act 1956, the Applicant and YHPJ Trustees (2018)

Limited be appointed as Trustees of the Trustee of the Eric and Phyllis

Clements Family Trust;

(c)simultaneously with parts (a) and (b) of the Order above, and pursuant to section 47 of the Trustee Act 1956, all property in the Eric and Phyllis Clements Family Trust be vested in the Applicant and YHPJ Trustees (2018) Limited as Trustees of the said Trust; and

(d)      the cost of the proceeding shall be met by the Trust.

...............................................

Toogood J

Details
AGLC
Clements v Clements [2018] NZHC 2657
Case
[2018] NZHC 2657
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Clements v Clements involved a dispute over the management of the Eric and Phyllis Clements Family Trust, settled by Phyllis Clements and her late husband Eric in 2002. Phyllis was the sole surviving trustee, but Kevin Allen Clements, the son of Phyllis and Eric and a beneficiary of the trust, sought to replace her as trustee due to her incapacity. Phyllis was under a disability and not capable of exercising her powers and duties as sole trustee. The Trust's beneficiaries included the settlors and their son, Kevin, with the settlors' grandchildren as the final beneficiaries. However, there were no grandchildren at present. The court was required to determine whether Kevin's application for the replacement of Phyllis as trustee was valid under the Trustee Act 1956.

The court found that Phyllis was incapable of fulfilling her duties as trustee, and there was no evidence of the need to consider the potential appointment of discretionary beneficiaries in the future. The court was satisfied that the application was valid and in the best interests of the Trust. The court ordered that Phyllis Irene Clements cease to be the trustee of the Eric and Phyllis Clements Family Trust, and that Kevin and YHPJ Trustees (2018) Limited be appointed as trustees in her place. The court also ordered that all property in the Trust be vested in the new trustees. The cost of the proceeding was to be met by the Trust.

This case highlights the importance of proper management of trusts and the need for trustees to be capable of fulfilling their duties. The court's decision to appoint new trustees in place of the incapacitated trustee ensures that the Trust's affairs are in order and that the interests of the beneficiaries are protected.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.