Clarke v Kiwirail Limited

Link copied
Case Copied 21 min read

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WHANGANUI REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA WHANGANUI ROHE

CRI 2014-083-957

[2019] NZHC 3454

THE QUEEN

v

DAVID OWEN LYTTLE

Counsel: M M Wilkinson-Smith and C A Middleton for Crown C W J Stevenson and E A Hall for Mr Lyttle

Date:

19 December 2019


SENTENCING NOTES OF MALLON J


Introduction

[1]                 David Lyttle, you appear for sentencing, having been convicted following a jury trial of murdering Bretton Hall.

Circumstances of offending

[2]                 You maintain you did not kill Mr Hall but you are to be sentenced in accordance with the jury’s verdict and the facts established at trial in light of that verdict.

[3]                 You had known Mr Hall for many years. You were close friends and he was the best man at your wedding. The events that gave rise to you killing your friend date back to late 2010 and into 2011.

R v LYTTLE [2019] NZHC 3454 [19 December 2019]

[4]                 At this time Mr Hall, who had spent some time in prison for drug offending, was on parole. He was living at his campsite, comprising a caravan and two sheds, on a property at Pitangi that he jointly owned with another man.

[5]                 The Pitangi property is rural and remote. It comprises many steep ridges and gullies and is largely covered by vegetation. It is accessed via the Pitangi Track which runs off the Whanganui River Road, about a 45 minute drive north of Whanganui. Access up the Pitangi Track is generally by four-wheel drive. At the top of the track is a flatter piece of grassed land where Mr Hall’s campsite was.

[6]                 You were building a house for Mr Hall on this site. Mr Hall loved his piece of land and knew how to look after himself in this wild but beautiful setting. He was excited about and focussed on getting his house built.

[7]                 It is fair to say that the agreement you had with Mr Hall for the build of the house was a good one for him. He paid you cash to purchase the building materials and you were to be paid for your labour once the house was at the lock up stage. The overall price for materials and your labour to that stage was $70,000. You were also to be paid for the petrol for the drive from your home in Halcombe to Pitangi.

[8]                 Progress with the build was much slower than Mr Hall anticipated for a range of reasons. You had a shoulder injury which limited your ability to do heavy work and you were incapacitated for period when you had surgery for that injury. Some of the issues with progress however, such as the title and plan issues, were not of your making but were a source of frustration for Mr Hall. Eventually the build got underway, but then Mr Hall became concerned that you were not using the money he gave you to buy building materials and,…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Clarke v Kiwirail Limited and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] NZHC 2454
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

David Lyttle was convicted of the murder of Bretton Hall, his close friend, following a jury trial. The court considered the circumstances of the offending, including the financial pressures Lyttle was under and the conflict over the money for the house build, and found that the killing was not premeditated. The court considered the aggravating and mitigating factors in determining the sentence. The court found that the standard sentence for murder of life imprisonment was appropriate, but set the minimum non-parole period at 11 years, taking into account the absence of premeditation, the breach of trust, the delay to trial and Lyttle's conduct after the killing. The court also warned Lyttle that any future convictions for serious violent offences would result in sentences without parole or early release.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.