Cavallo v R

Case [2022] NZCA 276


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND

I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA

 CA90/2020
 [2022] NZCA 276

BETWEEN

DENI CAVALLO
Appellant

AND

THE QUEEN
Respondent

CA109/2020

BETWEEN

MARIO HABULIN
Appellant

AND

THE QUEEN
Respondent

CA130/2020

BETWEEN

MATTHEW JOHN SCOTT
Appellant

AND

THE QUEEN
Respondent

Hearing:

3 August 2021 (further submissions received 16 September 2021)

Court:

Kós P, Miller and Collins JJ

Counsel:

M N Pecotic for Deni Cavallo
N P Chisnall and L A Elborough for Mario Habulin
T M Cooper and C G Farquhar for Matthew John Scott
C A Brook and P D Marshall for Respondent

Judgment:

30 June 2022 at 9 am

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

AThe applications to adduce fresh evidence are granted.

B    The appeals are allowed. 

C    The sentences imposed in the High Court are quashed and substituted with the following sentences: 

(a)     Mr Cavallo:  17 years and eight months’ imprisonment;

(b)     Mr Habulin:  23 years and four months’ imprisonment; and

(c)     Mr Scott:  20 years and five months’ imprisonment.

____________________________________________________________________

REASONS OF THE COURT

(Given by Kós P)

Table of Contents
Para No

The sentencing

Approach to sentencing
Starting points
Personal circumstances
Guilty pleas
Sentences imposed
Minimum period of imprisonment

Appeals
Issues on appeal

Application to adduce fresh evidence
Should cocaine offending be sentenced more leniently than methamphetamine offending?

Evidence of Professor White
Evidence of Professor Nutt
Evidence of Dr Schep
Submissions
Discussion

Were the individual sentences manifestly excessive?

Stage one:  sentence starting points
Stage two:  considerations personal to the appellants

(a)    Personal and cultural background considerations

(b)    Foreign prisoners

(c)   Good character, remorse and rehabilitation

(d)   Guilty pleas

(e)   Conclusion

Minimum period of imprisonment

Result

[5]
[5]
[8]
[17]
[20]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[28]
[32]

[33]
[35]
[38]
[45]
[47]
[52]
[64]
[65]
[76]
[77]
[80]
[83]
[86]
[87]
[88]
[89]

  1. In 2019 this Court issued a guideline judgment concerning the sentencing of methamphetamine offending:  Zhang v R.[1]  The primary question in this appeal is how, in light of Zhang, cocaine offending should be sentenced. 

  2. The essential facts are these.  The appellants are foreign nationals who were part of an international, organised criminal group.  They imported cocaine from South America through the Port of Tauranga in June, July and October 2017:

    (a)Mr Habulin, a Croatian national, imported a total of 76 kg of cocaine, in three shipments, supplying some 25 kg from the first two shipments to purchasers in New Zealand and transferring some $1,498,500 to representatives of a money-laundering ring.[2]

    (b)Mr Scott, an Australian national, assisted Mr Habulin to supply the first two shipments (as above), transferred some $1,192,000 to the money‑laundering ring, and then assisted Mr Habulin to import the third shipment (46 kg).[3]

    (c)Mr Cavallo, a Serbian national, assisted Mr Habulin to import the third shipment (46 kg).[4]

    [2]Resulting in the following charges:  1 x importing cocaine, 2 x supplying cocaine, 1 x money laundering, 1 x possessing cocaine for supply, 1 x…

Continue reading Cavallo v R

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Cavallo v The The Queen [2022] NZCA 276
Case
[2022] NZCA 276
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appellants, Deni Cavallo, Mario Habulin and Matthew John Scott, were foreign nationals involved in the importation of cocaine into New Zealand. The case before the New Zealand Court of Appeal concerned the sentencing of the appellants and the issue of whether cocaine offending should be sentenced more leniently than methamphetamine offending. The appellants argued that their sentences were manifestly excessive and that they should have been sentenced more leniently due to the comparative harm of cocaine and methamphetamine. The court considered expert evidence on the comparative harm and toxicity of cocaine and methamphetamine before concluding that cocaine should generally be sentenced slightly below comparable methamphetamine starting points, but dependent on crack cocaine consumption remaining rare in New Zealand. The court also found that the individual sentences were not manifestly excessive and allowed the appeals, substituting the sentences imposed in the High Court with new sentences of 17 years and 8 months' imprisonment for Cavallo, 23 years and 4 months' imprisonment for Habulin and 20 years and 5 months' imprisonment for Scott.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.