Bennett v Ebert Construction Limited (in receivership and liquidation)

Case

[2020] NZHC 1003

15 May 2020

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE

CIV-2018-485-792

[2020] NZHC 1003

UNDER the Receiverships Act 1993 and Part 19 of the High Court Rules 2016

BETWEEN

LARA MAREE BENNETT, JOHN HOWARD RISK and MICHAEL LONGMAN

Applicants

AND

EBERT CONSTRUCTION LIMITED

(in receivership and liquidation) Respondent

AUCKLAND VENTILATION SERVICES LIMITED

First Interested Party

TASLO STEEL SECURITY LIMITED

Second Interested Party

On the papers

Counsel:

R L Pinny for Applicants

Judgment:

15 May 2020


JUDGMENT (NO. 3) OF CHURCHMAN J


[1]        In November 2018, the applicants were appointed receivers of a fund comprising of retentions held on trust for the subcontractors of the  respondent (Ebert Construction Limited) (in receivership and liquidation).

[2]        The applicants have now completed the receivership and have filed a final report dated 9 April 2020.

BENNETT & ORS v EBERT CONSTRUCTION LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP AND LIQUIDATION) (NO. 3) [2020] NZHC 1003 [15 May 2020]

[3]        By application dated 20 April 2020, the applicants seek an order formally bringing the receivership of the retentions fund to an end.

[4]        Having reviewed the receivers’ report, I am satisfied that the receivership should be concluded. The receivership has resulted in a payment of approximately  96 cents in the dollar which, in the circumstances, represents a favourable outcome.

[5]        Accordingly, I formally order that the receivership of the retentions fund is now at an end. I note that the receivers continue to act as receivers of Ebert Construction Limited (in receivership and liquidation) and nothing in this order relates to that receivership.

Churchman J

Solicitors:
Simpson Grierson, Wellington for Applicants

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

1

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0