ASB Bank Limited v Robertson

Case [2012] NZHC 1949


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY

CIV-2012-404-0910 [2012] NZHC 1949

BETWEEN  ASB BANK LIMITED Plaintiff

ANDROSS ARTHUR ROBERTSON First Defendant

ANDCANDACE ANN ROBERTSON Second Defendant

Hearing:         On the Papers

Appearances: N Moffatt for Plaintiff

First and Second Defendants in Person

Judgment:      6 August 2012

COSTS JUDGMENT OF TOOGOOD J

This judgment was delivered by me on 6 August 2012 at

Pursuant to Rule 11.5 High Court Rules

Registrar/Deputy Registrar

N Moffatt, Bell Gully, Auckland:  [email protected]

R Robertson, Auckland:  [email protected]

LawesLaw, Orewa:  [email protected]

ASB BANK LIMITED V ROBERTSON & ANOR HC AK CIV-2012-404-0910 [6 August 2012]

[1]      On  5 July 2012  I  entered  summary  judgment  against  the  defendants.[1]      I directed that the defendants should pay the plaintiff’s costs calculated in accordance with the provisions of clause 16.8 of the standard terms and conditions attached to the two loan agreements which gave rise to the debt for which judgment was entered.

[1] ASB Bank Ltd v Robertson & Anor HC Auckland [2012] NZHC 1587, 5 July 2012.

[2]      I reserved leave to the parties to apply for further orders in the event of any dispute as to the appropriate amount of costs.

[3]      The plaintiff has filed the affidavit of a solicitor who has calculated the costs in terms of the order which I made.   The defendants were asked to confirm their agreement with the calculations in a letter dated 12 July 2012, but they have not responded to that invitation.

[4]      In the circumstances, I direct that the first and second defendants shall pay the plaintiff costs of $18,781.00 and disbursements of $1,360.31.

........................................

Toogood J


Details
AGLC
ASB Bank Limited v Robertson [2012] NZHC 1949
Case
[2012] NZHC 1949
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

ASB Bank Limited brought an action against Ross Arthur Robertson and Candace Ann Robertson in the High Court of New Zealand, Auckland Registry. The suit was initiated to recover a debt arising from two loan agreements. The court granted summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff and ordered the defendants to pay the plaintiff's costs as per the terms of the loan agreements. The case then proceeded to a determination of the exact amount of those costs.

The court had to decide on the appropriate amount of costs that the defendants should pay to the plaintiff. This involved verifying the calculations made by the plaintiff's solicitor and determining whether the defendants had any objections to these figures. The defendants were given an opportunity to respond to the calculations but failed to do so within the specified timeframe.

The court found that since the defendants did not respond to the invitation to confirm their agreement with the calculated costs, it was appropriate to proceed with the costs as calculated by the plaintiff's solicitor. The court thus directed that the defendants pay the plaintiff a total of $18,781.00 in costs and $1,360.31 in disbursements. The court emphasized that this was a final determination of the costs unless further application was made by the defendants.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.