IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND HAMILTON REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA KIRIKIRIROA ROHE
CIV-2016-419-000348 [2018] NZHC 1130
BETWEEN AS BASE LIMITED
First Plaintiff
SCOTT BASE LIMITED
Second PlaintiffAND
IMI DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
First Defendant
ROTOTUNA VENTURES LIMITED
Second Defendantcont .. /2
Hearing: [On the papers] Counsel:
S Ma Ching for the Plaintiffs D O’Neill for the Defendants
Judgment:
18 May 2018
FINAL JUDGMENT OF JAGOSE J
This judgment is delivered by me on 18 May 2018 at 4.45 pm pursuant to r 11.5 of the High Court Rules.
.....................................................
Registrar / Deputy Registrar
Solicitors/Counsel:
Lee Salmon Long, Auckland
D M O’Neill, Barrister, HamiltonRick Williams Associates, Albany, North Shore City
AS BASE LTD & ANOR v IMI DEVELOPMENTS LTD & ORS - Final [2018] NZHC 1130 [18 May 2018]
…2
GRAEME MATANGI
Third Defendant
TRIG GROUP LIMITED
Fourth DefendantTRIG HOLDINGS 2014 LIMITED
Fifth DefendantTRIG DEVELOPMENTS (2011) LIMITED
Sixth Defendant
KVN DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
Seventh Defendant3GNT LIMITED
Eighth DefendantGARY JOHN ILTON
Ninth DefendantGARY JOHN ILTON AND KAREN ILTON AS TRUSTEES OF THE ILTON BUSINESS TRUST
Tenth Defendant
GREGORY NEAL ILTON
Eleventh DefendantGREGORY NEAL ILTON AND VANESSA KAY MATANGI AS
TRUSTEES OF THE G & V ILTON BUSINESS TRUST
Twelfth Defendants
GRAEME SELWYN MATANGI, MELISSA BRIDGET MATANGI AND WAIRAU TRUSTEE LIMITED AS
TRUSTEES OF THE MGM TRUST
Thirteenth Defendants
[1] My interim judgment of 23 March 2018 directed the plaintiffs to file and serve an affidavit exhibiting a new reconciliation of the sums outstanding on three loans, calculated in accordance with that judgment, together with draft orders for sealing.1
[2] I anticipated judgment thereafter would issue in the plaintiffs’ favour for the outstanding balances of:
(a)the IMI loan jointly and severally against all defendants; and
(b)the KVM and Matangi loans jointly and severally against all defendants, with the exceptions of the thirteenth defendants’ Wairau Trustee Limited, and the other two thirteenth defendants being personally liable on those loans.
[3] Further affidavits of Anthony Thomas Scott and Jade Lynette Silvester, both sworn 10 April 2018, have now been filed. Mr Scott’s affidavit, incorporating information for Ms Silvester’s affidavit, provides the new reconciliation.
[4]I therefore order:
(a)the defendants are jointly and severally liable to the first plaintiff for the outstanding balance of the IMI Loan, which, as of 10 April 2018, was $270,168.97 including interest and solicitor-client costs recoverable under the term loan agreement dated 14 September 2012 and deeds of guarantee and indemnity applicable to the IMI Loan;
(b)the defendants, with the exception of the third-named thirteenth defendant, are jointly and severally liable to the second plaintiff for:
(i)the outstanding balance of the KVM Loan, which, as of 10 April 2018, was $639,835.05 including solicitor-costs recoverable under the various deeds of guarantee and indemnity applicable
1 AS Base Ltd v IMI Developments Ltd [2018] NZHC 511. For clarity, I note the internal reference at para [47] of the interim judgment – which records my finding the three loans are proved – should refer to para [22](a)-(c).
to the KVM Loan, and interest calculated in accordance with paragraph [48] of the interim judgment of 23 March 2018;
(ii)the outstanding balance of the Matangi Loan, which, as of 10 April 2018, was $194,208.81 including interest and solicitor- costs recoverable under the term loan agreement dated 10 July 2015 and various deeds of guarantee and indemnity applicable to the Matangi Loan;
(c)interest shall continue to accrue on the outstanding loan balances from the date of this judgment until payment:
(i)in respect of the IMI and Matangi Loans, at the rate of 25% p.a. under the term loan agreements dated 14 September 2012 and 10 July 2015 respectively;
(ii)in respect of the KVM Loan, in accordance with paragraph [48] of the Court’s interim judgment dated 23 March 2018, namely at rates calculated under the Interest on Money Claims Act 2016 not exceeding 5% p.a.
—Jagose J
- AGLC
- As Base Limited v IMI Developments Limited [2018] NZHC 1130
- Case
- [2018] NZHC 1130
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the loans were properly documented and enforceable, the calculation of interest and costs accruing on the loans, and the extent of liability under the guarantees. The court had to assess the reconciliation of accounts provided by the plaintiffs, determine the correct interest rates applicable, and interpret the terms of the guarantees and indemnities to establish the defendants' liability. The defendants contested the amounts claimed and argued that certain guarantees were invalid or unenforceable.
The court found that the loans were valid and enforceable, and the plaintiffs' reconciliation of the outstanding balances was accurate. The court ordered that the defendants were jointly and severally liable for the outstanding balances on the IMI and Matangi Loans, and for the KVM Loan, except for specific defendants who were not personally liable. The court also directed that interest would continue to accrue on the outstanding balances at specified rates until payment was made. The final orders required the defendants to pay the specified amounts, including interest and costs, to the plaintiffs.
The final orders of the court mandated that IMI Developments Limited and the other defendants were jointly and severally liable for the outstanding balance on the IMI Loan, which was $270,168.97 as of 10 April 2018. Similarly, they were liable for the outstanding balances on the KVM and Matangi Loans, except for specified defendants who were not personally liable. Interest was to accrue on these amounts at specified rates until payment was made. This judgment clarified the financial obligations of the defendants and provided a pathway for the plaintiffs to recover their dues.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.