Anthony Pratt Kaye and Morva Kaye v Norris Ward McKinnon

[2016] NZSC 104

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

SC 29/2016
[2016] NZSC 104

BETWEEN	ANTHONY PRATT KAYE AND MORVA KAYE Applicants
AND	NORRIS WARD MCKINNON Respondent

Court:	William Young, Glazebrook and OʼRegan JJ
Counsel:	Applicants in person M J Dennett and C A Robertson for Respondent
Judgment:	15 August 2016

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

The recall application is dismissed.

____________________________________________________________________

REASONS

1. The applicants seek a recall of our judgment of 15 June 2016 dismissing their application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the Court of Appeal.[1] 

   [1]Kaye v McKinnon [2016] NZSC 66.

2. The application is based on arguments which are (a) largely directed to what are said to be errors made by the High Court and Court of Appeal; and (b) more generally to the effect that leave to appeal ought to have been granted.  It is, in substance, an attempt to re-argue the application for leave to appeal.  Nothing has been advanced which would warrant a recall of our decision not to grant leave.

Solicitors:
Kennedys, Auckland for Respondent