Amfl Limited v Savill

Case

[2020] NZHC 2053

13 August 2020

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE

CIV-2020-409-000143

[2020] NZHC 2053

BETWEEN

AMFL LIMITED

Applicant

AND

SIMON LYDALL SAVILL

Respondent

Hearing: 13 August 2020

Appearances:

M J Hammer (via VMR) and C M O’Brien for Applicant D J Ballantyne for Respondent

Judgment:

13 August 2020

Reissued:

24 August 2020


RESULTS JUDGMENT OF DUNNINGHAM J


[1]    I am satisfied that the interim injunction should be rescinded in its entirety. In my view, the balance of convenience clearly favours AMFL being able to sell the property in its entirety, along with what have been described in submissions as the water assets.

[2]    I hope to get my reasons decision out as soon as practicable, but I do have a heavy schedule, so it might take some days.

Solicitors:

Canterbury Legal, Christchurch Anderson Lloyd, Queenstown

Copy to:
D J Ballantyne, Barrister, Christchurch

AMFL LIMITED v SIMON LYDALL SAVILL [2020] NZHC 2053 [13 August 2020]

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

1

AMFL Limited v Savill [2020] NZHC 3058
Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0