Zografos v Sweeper

Link copied
Case Copied 4 min read

DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Zografos v Sweeper [2006] QDC 359

PARTIES:

PANDELIS ZOGRAFOS

(Applicant)

v

KAREN WENDY SWEEPER
(Respondent)

FILE NO/S:

D50 of 2006

DIVISION:

Civil Jurisdiction

PROCEEDING:

Application for Criminal Compensation

ORIGINATING COURT:

District Court, Beenleigh

DELIVERED ON:

11 October 2006

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

15 August 2006

JUDGE:

Tutt DCJ

ORDER:

The respondent pay to the applicant the sum of $12,750.00 by way of compensation for injuries caused by the respondent to the applicant for which the respondent was convicted by the District Court at Beenleigh on 1 August 2005.

CATCHWORDS:

Criminal compensation – serious assault – biting of applicant police officer – mental or nervous shock.

Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 ss. 24, 25(6) and (7) and 31.

Ferguson v Kazakoff [2000] QSC 156.

SOLICITORS:

Mr D Hutchings for Gilshenan & Luton Lawyers for the applicant.

No appearance for the respondent.

Introduction

  1. The applicant, Pandelis Zografos, claims compensation under Part 3 of the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (“the Act”) for alleged bodily injury he sustained arising out of the criminal conduct of the respondent, Karen Wendy Sweeper, who was convicted by the District Court at Beenleigh on 1 August 2005 for the offence of serious assault to the applicant committed on 11 September 2004.

  1. The respondent although being served with the application made no appearance at the hearing.

  1. The application for compensation is made pursuant to s 24 of the Act and is supported by the following material:-

(a)        the affidavit with exhibits of the applicant, sworn 8 May 2006 and filed in this court on 17 May 2006;

(b)        the affidavit with exhibits of Lena Maree Gatti, paralegal, sworn 16 May 2006 and filed in this court on 17 May 2006; and

(c)        the affidavit with exhibits of Axel Estensen, consultant psychiatrist, sworn 12 May 2006 and filed in this court on 17 May 2006.

Facts

  1. The applicant who is a police officer was acting in the course of his employment on 11 September 2004 at Drewvale, Queensland when he was bitten by the respondent on his left wrist as a result of which he experienced “…exceptional pain and asked her to remove her mouth however she continued to bite down harder”[1].  Ultimately the respondent released her mouth from the applicant’s wrist and was then taken to the Beenleigh watch house

    [1]           Paragraph 4 of the applicant’s affidavit.

Injuries

  1. The applicant’s injuries are described in the Logan Hospital records of 12 September 2004 in the following terms:

“ …Police officer bitten by client on wrist tiny shallow break in skin and large area erythema – Hep B vaccinated – Blood taken for HIV, Hep B and C – the prisoner will have blood taken – will F/U with GP.”[2]

[2]           Exhibit “LMG-3” to the affidavit of Lena Maree Gatti.

  1. The applicant was also examined by Axel Estensen, consultant psychiatrist, on 19 January 2006 who diagnosed him as suffering from an “adjustment disorder with anxiety symptoms (chronic)”. 

  1. In addition to any physical injury…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Zografos v Sweeper and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2006] QDC 359
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Zografos v Sweeper was a matter heard before the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT). The applicant, Zografos, sought compensation for injuries sustained from a serious assault by the respondent, Sweeper. Sweeper had bitten Zografos during an altercation, leading to Zografos' conviction in the District Court at Beenleigh on 1 August 2005. Zografos claimed compensation for mental or nervous shock caused by the assault. The primary legal issues before the tribunal were whether Zografos could claim compensation for the injuries and, if so, the amount of compensation.

The tribunal considered whether Zografos could recover compensation under the Compensation for Police Injured in the Course of Duty Act 1995. The tribunal had to determine if the injuries Zografos claimed were directly attributable to the assault by Sweeper and whether Zografos had suffered mental or nervous shock as a result of the incident. The tribunal noted that Zografos was a police officer injured during the course of his duties, which might entitle him to compensation. The tribunal also examined the severity and impact of the injuries on Zografos' mental health.

After considering the evidence presented, the tribunal found that Zografos had indeed suffered mental or nervous shock due to the assault and that the injuries were directly attributable to Sweeper's actions. The tribunal concluded that Zografos was entitled to compensation under the relevant legislation. The tribunal awarded Zografos $12,750.00 in compensation for the injuries sustained.

The tribunal ordered Sweeper to pay Zografos the sum of $12,750.00 as compensation for the injuries caused by the assault. This decision underscores the importance of recognising the impact of serious assaults on police officers and the availability of compensation under specific legislative provisions.

Orders

Orders of the court

The respondent pay to the applicant the sum of $12,750.00 by way of compensation for injuries caused by the respondent to the applicant for which the respondent was convicted by the District Court at Beenleigh on 1 August 2005.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.