Zoabi v Canterbury-Bankstown Council

[2018] NSWLEC 1417

Land and Environment Court

New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation:	Zoabi v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2018] NSWLEC 1417
Hearing dates:	Conciliation conference on 11 July 2018
Date of orders:	09 August 2018
Decision date:	09 August 2018
Jurisdiction:	Class 1
Before:	Smithson C
Decision:	See [4] below
Catchwords:	DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited:	Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:	Principal judgment
Parties:	Rod Zoabi (Applicant) Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent)
Representation:	S Schneider, Houston Dearn O’Connor (Applicant) S Kondilios, Hall & Wilcox Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s):	2018/49374
Publication restriction:	No

Judgment

1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

1. The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application and rely on the plans referred to in Condition 6 (General) of Annexure “A” to this agreement.

2. The Appeal is upheld.

3. Development Application Number 422/2017 for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of 9 industrial units including 25 car spaces at ground level and associated landscaping is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.

4. The applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs thrown away pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed.

………………………….

Jenny Smithson

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (175 KB, pdf)

Decision last updated: 13 August 2018