Zhang (Migration)

Case

[2023] AATA 3878

17 July 2023


Zhang (Migration) [2023] AATA 3878 (17 July 2023)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Shengtai Zhang

CASE NUMBER:  2304829

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2022/537262

MEMBER:Gabrielle Cullen

DATE:17 July 2023

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 820 visa:

·Regulation 2.03AA(2)

Statement made on 17 July 2023 at 1:18pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa – Subclass 820 (Partner) – character test – statement from an appropriate authority – notarised no criminal record certificate from the Republic of China – updated Australian Police Certificate – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 65, 360
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), r 2.03AA; Schedule 2, cl 820.223; Schedule 4, PIC 4001

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicant a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).

  2. The applicant applied for the visa on 5 March 2022. The criteria for a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa are set out in Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations). Additional criteria are prescribed in Division 2.1 of Part 2 of the Regulations.

  3. Regulation 2.03AA of the Regulations applies where a person is required to satisfy Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4001 or 4002: reg 2.03AA(1). In this case, cl. 820.223(1) of Schedule 2 of the Regulations requires the applicant to meet PIC 4001. The applicant is therefore required to satisfy the criterion in reg 2.03AA(2).

  4. Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a) requires that, if requested, the applicant has provided a statement from a relevant authority in a country where the person resides or has resided that provides evidence about whether or not the person has a criminal history. Regulation 2.03AA(2)(b) requires that, if requested, the applicant has provided a completed approved Form 80. The Tribunal may waive the requirement in reg 2.03AA(2)(a) if it is not reasonable for the applicant to provide the statement: reg 2.03AA(3). The Tribunal cannot waive the requirement for the applicant to provide a completed Form 80.

  5. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 4 April 2023 on the basis that the applicant did not meet reg 2.03AA because he had not provided a notarised police certificate from China and one from Australia

  6. The applicant has since provided a notarised no criminal record certificate from the Republic of China dated 7 June 2023 recording no convictions and an updated  Australian Police Certificate dated  7 July 2023 recording no convictions.

  7. No hearing was held in this case as the Tribunal was able to make a favourable decision on the material before it. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  8. The issue in this case is whether the applicant has provided a statement by an appropriate authority that provides evidence about whether or not the person has a criminal history.

    Has the applicant provided a statement from an appropriate authority?

  9. The applicant has provided a notarised no criminal record certificate from the Republic of China dated 7 June 2023 recording no convictions and an updated  Australian Police Certificate dated  7 July 2023 recording no convictions.

  10. The Tribunal finds that the applicant has provided a statement from an appropriate authority and therefore meets Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a).

    Conclusion

  11. There is no evidence that the delegate made a request for the applicant to provide a completed approved Form 80, therefore the requirement in reg 2.03AA(2)(b) does not apply.

  12. On the basis of the above findings, the applicant meets reg 2.03AA(2)

    DECISION

  13. The Tribunal remits the application for a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 820 visa:

    ·Regulation 2.03AA(2).

Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Remedies

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0