Zeitouni & anor v Inner West Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1319
•08 August 2016
Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Zeitouni & anor v Inner West Council. [2016] NSWLEC 1319 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 2 August 2016 Date of orders: 08 August 2016 Decision date: 08 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Fakes C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION; Fencing and balustrades; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David and Melissa Zeitouni (Applicants)
Inner West Council (Respondent)Representation: Applicants: Mr A Seton (Solicitor)
Solicitors:
Respondent: Mr S Turner (Solicitor)
Applicants: Marsdens Law Group
Respondent: Inner West Council
File Number(s): 152621 of 2016 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is granted leave to amend the modification application by substituting the following plans as the plans relied upon for the pupose of the modification application.
Drawing No.
Drawing Title
Prepared by
Revision
Dated
A02
Ground Floor Plan
Architects Becerra
N
3/8/16
A05
Elevations
Architects Becerra
I
3/8/16
A07
Sections
Architects Becerra
H
3/8/16
A12
Elevations
Architects Becerra
I
3/8/16
The appeal is upheld.
The Application made by the Applicants to the Respondent on 18 December 2015 under Section 96(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to modify Development Consent No. D/2014/20 for “Demolition and construction of two x two-storey dwellings” on the land known as Lot 1 DP 599044, 77 Foster Street, Leichhardt (as modified on 1 August 2014) is determined by approving the modifications to Development Consent No. D/2014/20 as set out in Annexure A.
As a consequence of order (3) Development Consent No. D/2014/20 is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of development consent set out in Annexure B.
________________________
Judy Fakes
Commissioner of the Court
152621.16 Annexure A (259 KB, pdf)
152621.16 Annexure B (270 KB, pdf)
Decision last updated: 08 August 2016
0
0
1