Zac Weatherill v East 33 Farming Pty Ltd

Case [2023] FWC 558


[2023] FWC 558

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Zac Weatherill
v

East 33 Farming Pty Ltd

(U2023/1270)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 7 MARCH 2023

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy

  1. On 17 February 2023 Zac Weatherill (the Applicant) made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

  1. The application was incomplete in that the Applicant did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form.

  1. On 20 February 2023 the Commission sent correspondence to the Applicant’s nominated email address advising that their application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if they wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment is not made or a waiver form is not received within 7 calendar days the application may be dismissed.

  1. On 21 February 2023 a SMS notification was also sent to the Applicant’s nominated telephone number advising of the requirement to action the payment request email from the Fair Work Commission.

  1. On 23 February 2023 the Commission attempted to contact the Applicant on their nominated telephone number as a reminder that their application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if they wished to proceed with the application. The call was not answered. A voicemail message was left advising the Applicant that payment of the required fee was still outstanding.

  1. A final attempt to contact the Applicant on their nominated telephone number was made by the Commission on 28 February 2023 to obtain payment or a completed waiver form. The call was not answered. A voicemail message was left advising the Applicant that payment of the required fee was still outstanding.

  1. To date there has been no response from the Applicant, the required fee has not been paid and a completed waiver form has not been received.

  1. Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:

395 Application fees

(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.

(2) The regulations may prescribe:

(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and

(b) a method for indexing the fee; and

(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.

  1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. I am satisfied that, as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR760095>

Details
AGLC
Zac Weatherill v East 33 Farming Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 558
Case
[2023] FWC 558
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Zac Weatherill filed an application with the Fair Work Commission seeking a remedy for unfair dismissal. The respondent, East 33 Farming Pty Ltd, contested the application. The application was dismissed by the Fair Work Commission for non-compliance with statutory requirements. The primary issue before the Commission was whether the application complied with the necessary procedural requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the application was incomplete as the required filing fee had not been paid, and a completed waiver form had not been submitted. Under section 395 of the Act, an application to the Fair Work Commission must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations. The Commission had previously notified the applicant of the need to either pay the fee or submit a waiver form. Despite multiple attempts to contact the applicant, no action was taken, and the application remained incomplete.

The Commission considered whether the application could be dismissed under section 587(1)(a) of the Act, which allows for the dismissal of an application if it is not made in accordance with the Act. Commissioner Bissett determined that since the application was not accompanied by the required fee, it did not comply with the Act, warranting dismissal. Commissioner Bissett found that the application was not frivolous or vexatious, and the dismissal was based purely on the procedural non-compliance. The application was dismissed as it did not adhere to the mandatory requirements set out in the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.