Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Yu v Han [2022] NSWCATCD 93 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 6 June 2022 Decision date: 06 June 2022 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: P French, General Member Decision: 1. A hearing on the issue of costs is dispensed with pursuant to section 50(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.
2. Fanya Long, Feng Han and Angela Han must pay Xueyan Yu her costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed on an indemnity basis in accordance with the legal costs legislation.
Catchwords: COSTS – Party/Party – special circumstances justifying an award of costs – indemnity costs – where response to the application had no reasonable prospects of success – where respondent unreasonably delayed the finalisation of the proceedings – where respondent conducted proceedings in a way that disadvantaged the applicant
Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation 2019 (NSW)
Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW)
Residential Tenancies Regulation 2019 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Baulderstone Hornibrook Engineering Pty Ltd v Gordian Runoff Ltd (No. 2) [2009] NSWCA 12
Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (1995) 57 FCR 119
Becchara trading as Bechara and Company v Bates [2016] NSWCA 294
CPD Holdings Pty Ltd t/a The Bathroom Exchange v Baguley [2015 NSWCATAP 21
Cripps v G & M Mawson [2006] NSWCA 82
Degnam Pty Ltd (in Liq) v Wright (No 2) [1983] 2 NSWLR 354
Groth v Secretary, Department of Social Security [1995] FCA 989
Huang v Drumm [2017] NSWSC 1006
Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 at 543
Leichhardt Municipal Council v Green [2004] NSWCA 341and Ng v Chong [2005] NSWSC 385
Megerditchian v Kurmond Homes Pty Ltd NSWCATAP 120
Mendonca v Tonna [2017] NSWCATAP 176
Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) CLR 72 at 97
Phillips and Inspector-General in Bankruptcy [2012] AATA 788
Simone Starr-Diamond v Talus Diamond (no.4) [2013] NSWSC 811
Wentworth v Rogers (No.5) (1986) NSWLR 534
Texts Cited: Nil
Category: Costs Parties: Xueyan Yu (Applicant)
Fangya Long, Feng Han and Angela Han (Respondents)Representation: Solicitors:
KDA Legal (Applicant)
File Number(s): RT 21/45667 Publication restriction: Nil
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
-
This is an application by Xueyan Yu (the landlord) for an order from the Tribunal pursuant to section 60 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NCAT Act) that would require Fangya Long, Feng Han and Angela Han (the tenants) to pay her costs of the proceedings on an indemnity basis in the lump sum of $21,176.93 (the costs application).
-
For the reasons set out following I have determined that there are special circumstances in these proceedings that justify an award of costs in the landlord’s favour on an indemnity basis. However, I am not satisfied that there is sufficient material before me to enable a lump sum costs order to be made. The costs order will therefore require the tenants to pay the landlord’s costs as agreed or assessed on an indemnity basis.
Continue reading Yu v Han
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Yu v Han [2022] NSWCATCD 93
- Case
- [2022] NSWCATCD 93
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the respondents' response to the application lacked reasonable prospects of success, if they unreasonably delayed the finalisation of the proceedings, and if their conduct disadvantaged the applicant. The court found that the respondents' response had no reasonable prospects of success as it was not supported by any evidence or legal argument. Additionally, the court noted that the respondents unreasonably delayed the proceedings, which further justified the award of costs. The manner in which the respondents conducted the proceedings also disadvantaged the applicant, contributing to the court's decision.
Consequently, the court dispensed with a hearing on the issue of costs, pursuant to section 50(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. It ordered that Fanya Long, Feng Han, and Angela Han must pay Xueyan Yu her costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed on an indemnity basis in accordance with the relevant legal costs legislation. This decision underscores the importance of conducting proceedings in a manner that is fair and reasonable, with a duty to avoid unnecessary delays and to support submissions with appropriate evidence.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. A hearing on the issue of costs is dispensed with pursuant to section 50(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.
2. Fanya Long, Feng Han and Angela Han must pay Xueyan Yu her costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed on an indemnity basis in accordance with the legal costs legislation.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.