CITATION: Youyang v Minter Ellison [2001] NSWCA 198 FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40740/00 HEARING DATE(S): 25 June 2001 JUDGMENT DATE:
8 October 2001PARTIES :
Youyang Pty Limited (As Trustee of Bill Hayward Discretionary Trust)
v
(The persons listed in Schedule 1 trading as Minter Ellison Morris Fletcher, and later as Minter Ellison)JUDGMENT OF: Handley JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 25; Young CJ in Eq at 44
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT
FILE NUMBER(S) :ED 50083/99 LOWER COURT
JUDICIAL OFFICER :Brownie AJ
COUNSEL: A S Martin SC (Appellant)
I M Jackman/T M Faulkner (Respondents)SOLICITORS: Carneys (Appellant)
Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Respondents)CATCHWORDS: BREACH OF TRUST - causation - effect of consequential breach - equitable compensation. D. CASES CITED: Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] AC 421
Greater Pacific Investments Pty Ltd v Australian National Industries Ltd (1996) 39 NSWLR 143
O'Halloran v R T Thomas & Family Pty Ltd (1998) 45 NSWLR 262
Beach Petroleum NL v Kennedy (1999) 48 NSWLR 1
Maguire v Makaronis (1997) 188 CLR 449
Smith v Cock [1911] AC 317
Alexander & Ors (trading as Minter Ellison) v Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd & Anor [2001] NSW CA 240
Scholefield Ltd v Zyngier [1986] AC 562
TCN Channel 9 Pty Limited v Antoniadis [No 2] (1999) 48 NSWLR 381
Medlin v State Government Insurance Corporation (1995) 182 CLR 1
United Australia Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd [1941] AC 1
McKenzie v McDonald [1927] VLR 134
Timber Engineering Co Pty Ltd v Anderson [1980] 2 NSWLR 488
Mense v Milenkovic [1973] VR 784
Green v Weatherill [1929] 2 Ch 213
Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton & Co (1991) 85 DLR (4th) 129DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs. Cross-appeal allowed in part. Orders made
40740/00
ED 50083/99
HANDLEY JA
HODGSON JA
YOUNG CJinEQ
The proceedings arose from an investment made by the plaintiff with EC Consolidated Capital Ltd (ECCCL) in 1993. The investment agreement provided for Minter Ellison, ECCCL’s solicitors, to receive the plaintiff’s funds in trust and to disburse them in accordance with the agreement. The firm procured from Dresdner Bank AG (with whom some of the plaintiff ’s funds were to be invested) a certificate of deposit which did not comply with the agreement because it was not payable to bearer. The plaintiff was not informed of the breaches of duty. The plaintiff later executed a deed poll consenting to the release of the monies held by Dresdner. The deed poll instructed ECCCL to withdraw the funds but did not bind it to invest the funds in a specific way, and the plaintiff simply trusted ECCCL. ECCCL was wound up, and the plaintiff lost the whole of its investment.
The plaintiff commenced proceedings against the firm to recover equitable compensation for their breaches of trust. The Judge upheld…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Youyang Pty Ltd v Minter Ellison and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2001] NSWCA 198
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the defendant had breached its trust obligations to the plaintiff and, if so, whether that breach caused the loss for which the plaintiff sought compensation. The court also considered the effect of a consequential breach on the assessment of equitable compensation.
The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial judge's finding that Minter Ellison had breached its trust obligations. However, the court clarified the principles of causation in equity, particularly in the context of a breach of trust. It held that for equitable compensation to be awarded, the plaintiff must demonstrate a causal link between the breach of trust and the loss suffered. The court found that while the initial breach by Minter Ellison was established, the plaintiff had failed to prove that this breach directly caused the entirety of the loss claimed. The court applied established equitable principles regarding the assessment of compensation for breaches of trust, focusing on restoring the plaintiff to the position it would have been in had the breach not occurred.
The appeal by Youyang Pty Ltd was dismissed with costs. The cross-appeal by Minter Ellison was allowed in part, and consequential orders were made by the court.
Orders
Orders of the court
Appeal dismissed with costs. Cross-appeal allowed in part. Orders made
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.