Young v Roads and Maritime Services (No 2)

In *Young v Roads and Maritime Services (No 2)*, the applicant sought a stay of proceedings pending an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court. The respondent was Roads and Maritime Services.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient prospects of success in their proposed appeal to the High Court to warrant the granting of a stay of proceedings.

Macfarlan JA considered the applicant's arguments and concluded that there were no real prospects of success in the proposed appeal to the High Court. His Honour found that the grounds of appeal were without merit and that the application for special leave was unlikely to be granted. Consequently, the Court determined that a stay of proceedings was not warranted.

The notice of motion seeking the stay was dismissed with costs.