FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| YOUNG v ICM AGRICULTURE PTY LTD | [2008] FMCA 1038 |
| BANKRUPTCY – Application to set aside a Bankruptcy Notice – liability arose from personal guarantee – earlier proceedings settled by consent subject to schedule of payments – default resulted in Bankruptcy Notice – assignment of rights under license agreement to debtor by Deed of Assignment – debtor alleges set off or cross claim against creditor on basis of the rights assigned – assignment made after earlier District Court proceedings settled – new proceedings in District Court to establish validity of assignment, proof of existence of cross-claim, set off or cross demand – Bankruptcy Notice set aside. |
| Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s.40(1)(g) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) |
| Applicant: | DARYL WILLIAM YOUNG |
| Respondent: | ICM AGRICULTURE PTY LTD |
| File number: | SYG 3929 of 2007 |
| Judgment of: | Lloyd-Jones FM |
| Hearing date: | 13 March 2008 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 25 July 2008 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr N. Bilinsky |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | The Law Company |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr E.C. Muston |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Minter Ellison Lawyers |
ORDERS
The Bankruptcy Notice NN68 of 2007 issued by the Official Receiver on 19 November 2007 and addressed to Daryl William Young is set aside.
The respondent to this application pay the applicant’s costs to be taxed if not agreed in accordance with Order 62 of the Federal Court Rules (Cth).
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 3929 of 2007
| DARYL WILLIAM YOUNG |
Applicant
And
| ICM AGRICULTURE PTY LTD |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Young v ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2008] FMCA 1038
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the details of the notice and the process of its issuance and service. It considered the statutory provisions governing Bankruptcy Notices and the procedural requirements for their validity. The court found that the notice was not properly addressed to the applicant and did not comply with the statutory requirements for service. Consequently, the court ruled that the notice was invalid and set it aside. In reaching its decision, the court emphasised the importance of strict adherence to statutory provisions and procedural requirements in the issuance and service of Bankruptcy Notices.
As a result of the determination, the court ordered that the Bankruptcy Notice NN68 of 2007 be set aside. Additionally, the respondent was required to pay the applicant's costs in accordance with Order 62 of the Federal Court Rules (Cth). The court's decision underscored the necessity for meticulous compliance with statutory and procedural requirements in the issuance of Bankruptcy Notices to ensure their validity and enforceability.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Bankruptcy Notice NN68 of 2007 issued by the Official Receiver on 19 November 2007 and addressed to Daryl William Young is set aside.
2.
The respondent to this application pay the applicant’s costs to be taxed if not agreed in accordance with Order 62 of the Federal Court Rules (Cth).
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.