Young v Extrordinair Pty Ltd

Case [2022] VMC 28

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Young v Extrordinair Pty Ltd [2022] VMC 28

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Johns v Oaktech Pty Ltd [2020] VSCA 10
Citation 1 (Para 3)

…ase of this kind. That has been confirmed by the Court of Appeal in cases of this kind many times, most recently in Johns v Oaktech Pty Ltd. [4] [4][2020] VSCA 10 [76].…
Philippiadis v Transport Accident Commission [2016] VSCA 1
Citation 2 (Para 1)

…practitioners which are of course very often highly probative, but cannot be treated as a verbatim transcript of the entire medical attendance.[7] [7][2016] VSCA 1 [105] – [106].…
Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8
Citation 3

…an adverse inference ought to be drawn regarding Mr Hall’s non-attendance at Court. That was in accordance with the rule in Jones v Dunkel. [1] [1](1959) 101 CLR 298.…
Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 36
Citation 4

…[3] Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336.…
Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34
Citation 5

…[3] Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336.…
Pulling v Yarra Ranges Shire Council [2018] VSC 248
Citation 6 (Para 1)

…dence even where it may have been undermined by other evidence, including evidence that the worker may not have been fully frank with a doctor.[6] [5][2018] VSC 248 [50] to [55] ( ‘Pulling’ ). [6]Ibid [50].…

AI Chat coming soon