YE (Migration)
[2017] AATA 1764
•19 September 2017
YE (Migration) [2017] AATA 1764 (19 September 2017)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANTS: Mrs Lihua YE
Mr Yuzhou YECASE NUMBER: 1617008
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2016/394205
MEMBER:Wan Shum
DATE:19 September 2017
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Statement made on 19 September 2017 at 11:06am
CATCHWORDS
Migration – Employer Nomination (Permanent) visa – Decision already reviewed
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
CASES
Jayasinghe v MIEA (1997) 76 FCR 301
SZASP v MIAC [2007] FCA 771
SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 4 October 2016 to refuse to grant Employer Nomination (Permanent) visas under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 13 October 2016. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has found that it has no jurisdiction to review the decision.
An application for review of the same delegate’s decision was previously made to the Tribunal. The Tribunal made a decision on that application on 14 September 2017. Where the Tribunal has received a valid application for review of a reviewable decision and carried out its statutory duty to review the decision under the Act, the decision is no longer a reviewable decision: SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164 at [41] and the cases cited therein. The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review a delegate’s decision twice: Jayasinghe v MIEA (1997) 76 FCR 301 and SZASP v MIAC [2007] FCA 771.
As the delegate’s decision has already been the subject of a valid review by the Tribunal, it is no longer a reviewable decision. Accordingly, the Tribunal no longer has jurisdiction in relation to that decision.
DECISION
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Wan Shum
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
0
3
0