Yan (Migration)

Case

[2022] AATA 1425

9 May 2022


Yan (Migration) [2022] AATA 1425 (9 May 2022)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Jialiang Yan

REPRESENTATIVE:  Mr Minghuang Yan (MARN: 1572947)

CASE NUMBER:  2205620

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2020/2137978

MEMBER:Mary Sheargold

DATE:9 May 2022

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 485 visa:

·Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a) of the Regulations.

Statement made on 09 May 2022 at 4:20pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa – Subclass 485 (Temporary Graduate) – evidence of criminal history – national police certificate provided to tribunal – decision made without hearing necessary – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 65, 360(2)(a)
Migration Regulation 1994 (Cth), r 2.03AA(2)(a)

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicant a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act). The applicant applied for the visa on 21 August 2020. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 1 April 2022.

  2. The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of criminal history was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations).

  3. On 22 April 2022, the Tribunal received a National Police Certificate Immigration/Citizenship – Australia for the applicant dated 20 January 2022. In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

  4. In reaching its decision the Tribunal did not consider a hearing to be necessary, as it was able to find in favour of the applicant on the basis of the material before it, pursuant to s 360(2)(a) of the Act.

    DECISION

  5. The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 485 visa:

    ·Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a) of the Regulations.

    Mary Sheargold
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Natural Justice

  • Remedies

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0