XXX (Migration)

Case

[2019] AATA 1584

14 May 2019


XXX (Migration) [2019] AATA 1584 (14 May 2019)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANTS:  Mrs Khushpreet Kaur Bajwa XXX
Mr Jagdeep Singh
Master Pavnoor Singh Dhillon

CASE NUMBER:  1901107

DIBP REFERENCE(S):  BCC2018/3379784

MEMBER:Donna Petrovich

DATE:14 May 2019

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visas for reconsideration, with the direction that the first named applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa

·cl.500.217 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

·PIC 4005(1) of Schedule 4

The Tribunal further finds that the secondary applicants meet:

·cl.500.317 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

·P           IC 4005(1) of Schedule 4

Statement made on 14 May 2019 at 12:06pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – health criteria – evidence of medical assessment – auto cleared results – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 2, cls 500.217, 500.317; Schedule 4, PIC 4005

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of decisions made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 10 January 2019 to refuse to grant the applicants Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visas under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

  2. The applicants applied for the visas on 6 September 2018. The delegate refused to grant the visa on the basis that the first named applicant (now referred to as the applicant) did not satisfy cl.500.217 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) because the health criteria in Public Interest Criterion (‘PIC’) 4005 of Schedule 4 to the Regulations was not met. The Second and Third named applicants do not satisfy 500.317 of Schedule 2 as they do not satisfy PIC4005.

  3. The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of a medical assessment was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).

  4. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration consideration of Claims and evidence

  5. The issue in this review is whether the visa applicants meets Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4005 as required by the criteria for the grant of the visa. Public Interest Criterion 4005, as it applies to this case, is extracted in the attachment to this decision. It requires the applicant, in certain circumstances, to undergo medical assessment, and to be free of certain diseases or conditions that may impact on the community.

  6. On the 5th February 2019 the Tribunal received a submission from the applicants indicating they had undertaken the required medical examinations.

  7. A subsequent investigation of ICSE records confirmed auto cleared results.

  8. In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration. 

  9. Given the findings above, the appropriate course is for the Tribunal to remit the matter to the Minister for reconsideration of the remaining criteria for the visa.

    DECISION

  10. The Tribunal remits the application for Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visas for reconsideration, with the direction that the first named applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:

    cl.500.217 of Schedule 2 to the Regulation

    ·PIC 4005(1)of Schedule 4

    The Tribunal further finds that the secondary applicants meet:

    ·cl.500.317 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

    ·PIC 4005(1) of Schedule 4

    Donna Petrovich
    Member


    ATTACHMENT

    Migration Regulations 1994

    Schedule 4

    4005(1)         The applicant:

    (aa)if the applicant is in a class of persons specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this paragraph:

    (i)must undertake any medical assessment specified in the instrument; and

    (ii)must be assessed by the person specified in the instrument;

    unless a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth decides otherwise; and

    (ab)must comply with any request by a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth to undertake a medical assessment; and

    (a)is free from tuberculosis; and

    (b)is free from a disease or condition that is, or may result in the applicant being, a threat to public health in Australia or a danger to the Australian community; and

    (c)is free from a disease or condition in relation to which:

    (i)a person who has it would be likely to:

    (A)require health care or community services; or

    (B)meet the medical criteria for the provision of a community service;

    during the period described in subclause (2); and

    (ii)the provision of the health care or community services would be likely to:

    (A)result in a significant cost to the Australian community in the areas of health care and community services; or

    (B)prejudice the access of an Australian citizen or permanent resident to health care or community services;

    regardless of whether the health care or community services will actually be used in connection with the applicant; and

    (d)if the applicant is a person from whom a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth has requested a signed undertaking to present himself or herself to a health authority in the State or Territory of intended residence in Australia for a follow-up medical assessment — has provided the undertaking.

    (2)For subparagraph (1) (c) (i), the period is:

    (a)for an application for a permanent visa — the period commencing when the application is made; or

    (b)for an application for a temporary visa:

    (i)the period for which the Minister intends to grant the visa; or

    (ii)if the visa is of a subclass specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this subparagraph — the period commencing when the application is made.

    (3)If:

    (a)the applicant applies for a temporary visa; and

    (b)the subclass being applied for is not specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing made for subparagraph (2) (b) (ii);

    the reference in sub-subparagraph (1) (c) (ii) (A) to health care and community services does not include the health care and community services specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing made for this subclause.

Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Remedies

  • Statutory Construction

  • Jurisdiction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0