XU (Migration) [2018] AATA 1568 (28 March 2018)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr Dong Xu
CASE NUMBER: 1705323
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2017/138573
MEMBER:Katie Malyon
DATE:28 March 2018
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa.
Statement made on 28 March 2018 at 4:15 pm
CATCHWORDS
Migration – Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa – Subclass 485 (Temporary Graduate) – Whether the applicant satisfies the study requirement of 92 weeks – Studies cumulatively greater than 92 weeks – Whether the applicant’s studies are “closely related” to his nominated occupation – Computer Network and Systems Engineer – Advanced Diploma in Translation – Studies not closely related to nominated position – Decision under review affirmedLEGISLATION
Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (Cth), s 9
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), rr 1.03, 1.15F, 2.26AC(6), Schedule 2, cls 485.221, 485.222CASES
Chawdhury v MIAC [2010] FMCA 275
Constantino v MIBP [2013] FCA 1301
MIBP v Dhillon (2014) 227 FCR 525
Prasad v MIAC [2012] FCA 591
Shafiuzzaman v MIAC [2011] FMCA 874
Talha v MIBP [2015] FCAFC 115
Uddin v MIAC [2010] FCA 1281STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 8 March 2017 to refuse to grant the applicant, Mr Dong Xu, a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
Mr Xu applied for the visa on 11 January 2017. Visa Class VC contains Subclass 485. For visa applications made before 1 July 2013, there is also a Subclass 487: however, that Subclass is not relevant to the present matter. The criteria for the grant of a Subclass 485 visa are set out in Part 485 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
The delegate refused to grant the visa as Mr Xu did not satisfy cl.485.221 and cl.486.222 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations because his Bachelor of Information Technology degree obtained from the University of Wollongong (UoW) was completed on 15 December 2015 which is more than 6 months prior to lodging his Subclass 485 visa application and, furthermore, his Advanced Diploma of Translating from Abbey College Australia (Abbey) completed on 10 November 2016 was not closely related to his nominated occupation of Computer Network and Systems Engineer ANZSCO 263111. A copy of the delegate’s decision was provided to the Tribunal.
Mr Xu appeared before the Tribunal on 28 September 2017 to give evidence and present arguments. The Tribunal hearing was conducted with the assistance of an interpreter in the Mandarin and English languages: however, the Tribunal notes that Mr Xu had only occasional use of the interpreter. Mr Xu was represented in relation to the review by his registered migration agent. Although the representative not attend the hearing, the…
Continue reading XU (Migration)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- XU (Migration) [2018] AATA 1568
- Case
- [2018] AATA 1568
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Tribunal was required to determine two key legal issues: first, whether Mr. Xu had satisfied the ‘Australian study requirement’ in the six months immediately preceding his visa application; and second, whether each qualification relied upon to satisfy this requirement was ‘closely related’ to his nominated skilled occupation. The nominated occupation was Computer Network and Systems Engineer.
The Tribunal reasoned that the ‘Australian study requirement’ necessitates completion of at least two academic years of study, defined as a minimum of 92 weeks, from registered courses with instruction in English, undertaken in Australia. Mr. Xu provided evidence of a Bachelor of Information Technology degree completed in December 2015 and an Advanced Diploma of Translating completed in November 2016. While the Bachelor of Information Technology met the duration requirement, the Advanced Diploma of Translating, registered for 50 weeks, did not meet the 92-week minimum when considered alone. Crucially, the Tribunal found that the Advanced Diploma of Translating was not closely related to the nominated occupation of Computer Network and Systems Engineer, which involves technical IT roles as outlined in ANZSCO Version 1.2.
Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that Mr. Xu did not satisfy the Australian study requirement as defined by the regulations, nor the closely related qualification criterion. Therefore, the decision under review, which was not to grant the visa, was affirmed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.