Xhindoli (Migration)

Case

[2019] AATA 6265

4 December 2019


Xhindoli (Migration) [2019] AATA 6265 (4 December 2019)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Lucian Xhindoli

CASE NUMBER:  1912017

DIBP REFERENCE(S):  BCC2019/2269300

MEMBER:P. Wood

DATE:4 December 2019

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:

·cl.500.215 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

Statement made on 04 December 2019 at 4:37pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION –Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – subclass 500 (Student) visa– adequate evidence of health insurance provided – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 500.215

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The applicant applied for the visa on 26 April 2019. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 30 April 2019.

  2. The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of health insurance was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).

  3. The applicant has since provided adequate evidence of health insurance. In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

    DECISION

  4. The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:

    ·cl.500.215 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

    P. Wood
    Senior Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Remedies

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Judicial Review

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0