| WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION | ||
| DETERMINATION OF APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE COMMISSION CONSTITUTED BY AN ARBITRATOR | ||
| CITATION: | XCI Pty Ltd (in liq) v Thompson [2016] NSWWCCPD 58 | |
| APPELLANT: | XCI Pty Ltd | |
| RESPONDENT: | Jamie Thompson | |
| INSURER: | QBE Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd | |
| FILE NUMBER: | A1-1321/16 | |
| ARBITRATOR: | Mr P Sweeney | |
| DATE OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION: | 7 July 2016 (amended 14 July 2016) | |
| DATE OF APPEAL DECISION: | 6 December 2016 | |
SUBJECT MATTER OF DECISION: | Challenges to the reliability of evidence; parties bound by the conduct of their counsel; Smits v Roach [2006] HCA 36; 227 CLR 423; appellants are bound by the forensic decisions made during the conduct of a hearing; Delaney v Winn [2015] NSWCA 124 | |
| PRESIDENTIAL MEMBER: | President Judge Keating | |
| HEARING: | On the papers | |
| REPRESENTATION: | Appellant: | Gillis Delaney Lawyers |
| Respondent: | Beilby Poulden Costello | |
| ORDERS MADE ON APPEAL: | 1. Pursuant to s 162 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 a declaration is made that XCI Pty Ltd (in liq) has entered into a contract with QBE Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd in respect of liability under that Act, and has commenced to be wound up after entering into that contract. 2. The Arbitrator’s Amended Certificate of Determination of 14 July 2016 is confirmed. | |
INTRODUCTION
The worker claimed lump sum compensation in respect of a primary psychological injury arising from an accepted injury on 7 September 2010.
Apart from some minor complaints at the time of injury, a substantial period of time elapsed before the worker reported symptoms which were subsequently diagnosed as post-traumatic stress disorder. The claim was disputed in the s 74 notice for a number of reasons including the worker’s reliability in terms of having failed to report symptoms for over two years and upon feigning results during the course of neuro-psychological testing.
The reliability of the worker was not pressed during the hearing before the Arbitrator. The appellant’s counsel eschewed the opportunity to raise a credit issue in relation to the delayed reporting of symptoms. In the circumstances the Arbitrator concluded that he could not determine the matter on the basis of an adverse credit finding.
For the reasons explained in this decision, the appeal is unsuccessful primarily on the ground that parties are bound by the conduct of their case at arbitration.
BACKGROUND
The respondent worker, Jamie Thompson, was employed by the appellant employer, XCI Pty Ltd (formerly Eire Contractors Pty Ltd), as a pipe layer/labourer.
On 7 September 2010, Mr Thompson had been working in a deep trench for the purpose of repositioning a sling around pipes that were being manoeuvred into position. Whilst undertaking this activity Mr Thompson was crushed between two pipes and was injured.
On 11 October 2010, Mr Thompson resigned from his role with the employer. Thereafter he was self-employed as a maintenance worker until 2013.
The appellant’s insurer QBE Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd (QBE) paid Mr Thompson weekly benefits in respect of the injury of 7 September 2010 for a short closed period; the precise dates are unclear.
On 13 October 2014, Mr…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read XCI Pty Ltd (in liq) v Thompson and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] NSWWCCPD 58
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether the liquidator was bound by the actions of its counsel, who had failed to object to certain evidence presented by the respondent. The liquidator argued that the evidence was unreliable and should not have been admitted. However, the court noted that, in accordance with established case law, parties are generally bound by the decisions made by their legal representatives during a hearing. The court cited the principles from Smits v Roach and Delaney v Winn, which emphasised that a party cannot later challenge the admissibility of evidence if their counsel did not object to it at the time it was presented.
In applying these principles, the court found that the liquidator was bound by the conduct of its counsel. Since the counsel had not objected to the evidence, the court confirmed the Arbitrator’s Amended Certificate of Determination. The court also made a declaration that XCI Pty Ltd had entered into a contract with QBE Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd and had commenced to be wound up after entering into that contract, as per the provisions of the Workers Compensation Act 1987. The liquidator's appeal was therefore dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to s 162 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 a declaration is made that XCI Pty Ltd (in liq) has entered into a contract with QBE Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd in respect of liability under that Act, and has commenced to be wound up after entering into that contract.
2. The Arbitrator’s Amended Certificate of Determination of 14 July 2016 is confirmed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.